[2018] KEHC 9116 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 9116 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's failure to register the charges within the prescribed period was due to inadvertence, as evidenced by the affidavit of the applicant's director. The court was satisfied that the delay was not intentional and that granting the extension would not prejudice the position of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 9116 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gulf Energy Limited; Respondent: Equity Bank (K) Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 121 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Register Company Charges
Outcome
application granted
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Company Charges, Registration of Charges, Extension of Time, Companies Act Compliance
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Company Charges Registration of Charges Extension of Time Companies Act Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gulf Energy Limited

Applicant

Equity Bank (K) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Register Company Charges

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to register company charges under Section 885(1) of the Companies Act, 2015.
  2. 2 Whether the failure to register the charges was due to inadvertence and if such failure prejudices creditors or members of the company.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's failure to register the charges within the prescribed period was due to inadvertence, as evidenced by the affidavit of the applicant's director. The court was satisfied that the delay was not intentional and that granting the extension would not prejudice the position of creditors or members of the company. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion under Section 888 of the Companies Act 2015 to grant the applicant 120 days from the date of the order to complete the registration of the charges as required by Section 885(1) of the Act.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The applicant is granted 120 days from the date of this order to register the charges as required under Section 885(1) of the Companies Act 2015.
  • There shall be no order as to costs of the Notice of Motion dated 20th April 2018.