[2019] KEHC 7788 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7788 (KLR)

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the respondent did not meet the threshold for a preliminary objection as established in Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd. The issues raised required the ventilation of facts and could not be determined as pure points of law....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 7788 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Tony Charles Wambaa; Applicant: Violet Wangari Kambaa; Respondent: Jackson Nganga Kimachia
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 901 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Jurisdiction, Res Judicata, Land Registration, Succession Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Preliminary Objection Jurisdiction Res Judicata Land Registration Succession Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tony Charles Wambaa

Applicant

Violet Wangari Kambaa

Applicant

Jackson Nganga Kimachia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the preliminary objection raised by the respondent meets the legal threshold for a preliminary objection.
  2. 2 Whether the succession court has jurisdiction to grant the remedies sought in the application dated 30.11.2018.
  3. 3 Whether the application is res judicata or time barred.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the respondent did not meet the threshold for a preliminary objection as established in Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd. The issues raised required the ventilation of facts and could not be determined as pure points of law. Consequently, the preliminary objection was dismissed, and the parties were directed to proceed to a hearing of the substantive application.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection dated 25th January 2019 is dismissed.
  • Parties are directed to appear in court for directions on the hearing of the application dated 30th November 2018.