[2024] KEHC 14461 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 14461 (KLR)

The court found that the application for review of the order revoking the grant did not meet the threshold under Order 45(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, as the applicants failed to provide any grounds or demonstrate discovery of new evidence, error on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 14461 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Christina Damaris Mukolwe Odityo; Applicant: Christopher Joel Kabechi Odityo; Respondent: Nelson Wekulo Odityo; Respondent: Tom Mumero Odityo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Review and Appointment of Administrators
Outcome
Application for review dismissed; application for appointment of new administrators allowed.
Judges
SC Chirchir
Legal Topics
Grant Revocation, Appointment of Administrators, Delay in Distribution, Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Grant Revocation Appointment of Administrators Delay in Distribution Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christina Damaris Mukolwe Odityo

Applicant

Christopher Joel Kabechi Odityo

Applicant

Nelson Wekulo Odityo

Respondent

Tom Mumero Odityo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Review and Appointment of Administrators

  1. 1 Whether the application for review of the order revoking the grant meets the threshold under Order 45(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to be appointed as administrators of the estate in place of the previous administrators.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in distribution of the estate justifies revocation and reappointment of administrators.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for review of the order revoking the grant did not meet the threshold under Order 45(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, as the applicants failed to provide any grounds or demonstrate discovery of new evidence, error on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason. The application was therefore dismissed. In contrast, the application by the personal representatives of a deceased beneficiary was merited, as the delay in distribution of the estate had prejudiced the administration of their own father’s estate. The applicants were entitled to be appointed as administrators, given their legal standing and the absence of opposition. The court allowed...

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed; application for appointment of new administrators allowed.

Orders

  • The application dated 7/6/2023 is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
  • Prayer 2 of the chamber summons dated 9/11/2022 is allowed with no orders as to costs.