[2024] KEHC 3575 (KLR)
The court found that, although the Law of Succession Act does not provide an automatic right of appeal from the High Court to the Court of Appeal, precedent and constitutional provisions allow for such an appeal with leave. The applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal, and to preserve the estate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 3575 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Charles Mugambi; Objector: Magret Karamana Manyara; Objector: Joyce Kaguri Gikundi; Objector: Gladys Kamiru; Objector: Elizabeth Nkirote; Objector: Martha Kairuthi; Objector: Harriet Karuru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 415 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal granted; orders for inhibition to preserve the estate pending appeal; costs in the appeal.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Succession Procedure, Leave to Appeal, Confirmation of Grant, Administration of Estates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Mugambi
Petitioner
Magret Karamana Manyara
Objector
Joyce Kaguri Gikundi
Objector
Gladys Kamiru
Objector
Elizabeth Nkirote
Objector
Martha Kairuthi
Objector
Harriet Karuru
Objector
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to leave to appeal the court's ruling dated 27th July, 2023.
- 2 Whether a stay of further proceedings pending appeal should be granted.
- 3 Whether the Law of Succession Act provides for an automatic right of appeal from the High Court to the Court of Appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the Law of Succession Act does not provide an automatic right of appeal from the High Court to the Court of Appeal, precedent and constitutional provisions allow for such an appeal with leave. The applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal, and to preserve the estate pending appeal, the court ordered that an inhibition be registered against each portion of the estate upon distribution, restricting dealings until the appeal is determined or further orders are made. Costs were ordered to be in the appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal granted; orders for inhibition to preserve the estate pending appeal; costs in the appeal.
Orders
- Petitioner/Applicant is granted leave to appeal the court’s ruling dated 27th July, 2023.
- Upon distribution of the deceased’s estate comprised in LR. NYAKI/MULATHANKARI/472, an order of inhibition shall be registered against each portion to restrict the parties from charging, selling, disposing of, or otherwise dealing with their respective portions pending the hearing and determination of the intended...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
In re Estate of Igweta Turuchiu (Deceased) (Succession Cause 415 of 2012) [2024] KEHC 3575 (KLR) (21 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 3575 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Succession Cause 415 of 2012
TW Cherere, J
March 21, 2024
Between
Charles Mugambi
Petitioner
and
Magret Karamana Manyara
1st Objector
Joyce Kaguri Gikundi
2nd Objector
Gladys Kamiru
3rd Objector
Elizabeth Nkirote
4th Objector
Martha Kairuthi
5th Objector
Harriet Karuru
6th Objector
Ruling
1. By a ruling dated, 27th July, 2023, this court made the following orders;1. Magret Karamana Manyara, Joyce Kaguri Gikundi, Gladys Kamiru, Elizabeth Nkirote, Martha Kairuthi and Harriet Karuru are beneficiaries of deceased’s estate2. Letters of administration issued to the Respondent on 03rd November, 2014 are hereby revoked and Charles Mugambi and Magret Karamana Manyara are appointed joint administrators with an order that Letter of Administration issue to them forthwith3. The Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 23rd September, 2015 in which the estate was distributed solely to the Respondent is revoked and it is directed that LR. NYAKI/MULATHANKARI/472 be reverted to the name of Igweta Turuchiu (Deceased)4. The administrators shall within 45 days of this order apply for confirmation of grant after identifying the respective shares of each beneficiary5. The status quo that obtained prior to the purported distribution conducted by the Petitioner/Respondent shall remain pending the distribution of the estate6. This cause shall be mentioned on 26th October, 2023 to confirm compliance with these orders and for further orders and/or directions7. Costs shall be paid by the Petitioner/ Respondent
2. By summons dated 27th February, 2024, Charles Mugambi (Petitioner/Applicant) seeks leave to appeal, the foregoing rulng and stay of further proceedings pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal.
3. The summons is supported by Petitioner/Applicant’s affidavit sworn on 27th February, 2024 in which he avers that he is aggrieved by the court’s ruling and is likely to suffer substantial loss if Objectors are allowed to inherit what they are not entitled to.
4. Counsel for the Objectors proposed to file a response to the summons but as at the time of writing this ruling, none had been filed.
5. I have considered the summons and I note that under the provisions of the Law of Succession Act (cap.160), there is no specific provision for filing an appeal to the Court of Appeal from a succession cause heard and determined by the High Court. However, courts have held that an appeal to the Court of Appeal can be filed, subject to leave being granted by the High Court or the Court of Appeal. This position was reiterated by the Court of Appeal in the case of Rhoda Wairimu Karanja & Another –vs- Mary Wangui Karanja & Another (2014) eKLR when the court stated as follows –“We think we have said enough to demonstrate that under the Law of Succession Act, there is no express automatic right to appeal to the Court of Appeal, that an appeal will lie to the Court of Appeal from the decision of the High Court exercising original jurisdiction with leave of the High Court or where the application for leave is refused, with leave of this court”
6. Article 50 of the Constitution guarantees any person the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair and public hearing before a court or, if appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or body and that includes an appeal from any decision as by law provided.
7. From the foregoing, it is hereby ordered as follows:1. Petitioner/Applicant is granted leave to appeal this court’s ruling dated 27th July, 20232. In order to preserve the estate pending appeal it is ordered that upon distribution of deceased’s estate comprised in LR. NYAKI/MULATHANKARI/472, an order of inhibition shall be registered against each portion to restrict the parties from charging, selling, disposing off or in any adverse manner dealing with their respective portions pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal and/or until any and or further orders of the court3. Costs shall be in the appeal
DATED AT MERU THIS 21st__Day ofMarch__ 2024WAMAE. T. W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistants - Kinoti/MuneneFor Objectors - N/A for Kiogora Mugambi & Co. AdvocatesFor Petitioner/Applicant - Mr. Muthomi for John Muthomi & Co. AdvocatesPage 4 of 4