[2018] KEHC 8052 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8052 (KLR)

The court found that the proposed distribution of the estate was not in compliance with the Law of Succession Act, as several daughters of the deceased were excluded from inheritance without their express renunciation. The administrator's sale of estate property prior to confirmation of grant was declared void ab...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 8052 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Muthamia Nteto; Respondent: Joanina Nteto; Respondent: Stanley Muthuku; Respondent: Japhet N. Muthamia; Respondent: Joakim Kanyaki; Respondent: Lawrence Mukaraia Muthamia; Respondent: Jackson Kauabia; Respondent: Mary Gakii; Respondent: Petithia Mukiri; Respondent: Millamia Rumano; Respondent: Elizabeth Genaro; Respondent: Marieta Samson; Respondent: Tabitha Joseph Pasquarina Lawrence; Respondent: Charity Mungiria; Respondent: Mary Mureithi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 633 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Outcome
Partial confirmation of grant with redistribution ordered to include previously excluded daughters; sale of estate property prior to confirmation declared void.
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Administrator Powers, Equal Sharing Among Children, Sale of Estate Property, Consent of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Administrator Powers Equal Sharing Among Children Sale of Estate Property Consent of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Muthamia Nteto

Applicant

Joanina Nteto

Respondent

Stanley Muthuku

Respondent

Japhet N. Muthamia

Respondent

Joakim Kanyaki

Respondent

Lawrence Mukaraia Muthamia

Respondent

Jackson Kauabia

Respondent

Mary Gakii

Respondent

Petithia Mukiri

Respondent

Millamia Rumano

Respondent

Elizabeth Genaro

Respondent

Marieta Samson

Respondent

Tabitha Joseph Pasquarina Lawrence

Respondent

Charity Mungiria

Respondent

Mary Mureithi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the proposed distribution of the deceased's estate is in accordance with the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the administrator had authority to sell estate property before confirmation of grant.
  3. 3 Whether all beneficiaries, including daughters, are entitled to a share of the estate unless they have expressly renounced their rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposed distribution of the estate was not in compliance with the Law of Succession Act, as several daughters of the deceased were excluded from inheritance without their express renunciation. The administrator's sale of estate property prior to confirmation of grant was declared void ab initio, as administrators are required to preserve the estate for distribution and not to benefit personally or dispose of assets prematurely. The court held that, in the absence of minor children and without valid renunciation by any beneficiary, all children of the deceased are entitled to equal shares of the estate. The court ordered a redistribution to ensure that the...

Court Disposition

Partial confirmation of grant with redistribution ordered to include previously excluded daughters; sale of estate property prior to confirmation declared void.

Orders

  • Petithia Mukiri to give up 1 acre to be shared equally between Millamia Rumano and Marietta Samson (½ acre each).
  • David Muthamia Nteto to retain 2 acres; ½ acre from his share to go to Mary Mureithi.