[2024] KEHC 15808 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15808 (KLR)

The court held that the proper procedure for seeking transfer of a High Court matter from one station to another is to file the application within the substantive cause at the station where the matter is pending, not by initiating a miscellaneous cause at the station to which transfer is sought. The court lacked...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15808 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bernadete Achieng Okoth; Applicant: Carolyne Akech Wanzala; Applicant: Elvine Odhiambo Makokha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Application E006 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Succession Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Cause
Outcome
Application for transfer of cause ordered; if transfer not possible, application dismissed and file closed.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Succession Cause Transfer, Jurisdiction of High Court, Procedure for Transfer, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Cause Transfer Jurisdiction of High Court Procedure for Transfer Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernadete Achieng Okoth

Applicant

Carolyne Akech Wanzala

Applicant

Elvine Odhiambo Makokha

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Succession Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Cause

  1. 1 Whether a miscellaneous cause can be filed at a High Court station to seek transfer of a matter pending before another High Court station.
  2. 2 Whether the application for transfer should have been filed in the substantive succession cause rather than as a miscellaneous application.
  3. 3 Whether the court at Busia has sufficient information to determine the appropriateness of transferring Milimani HCSC No. 987 of 2005.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the proper procedure for seeking transfer of a High Court matter from one station to another is to file the application within the substantive cause at the station where the matter is pending, not by initiating a miscellaneous cause at the station to which transfer is sought. The court lacked sufficient information about the assets and the substantive cause in Nairobi to make a determination on the transfer. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of the present miscellaneous cause from Busia to the Family Division at Milimani, Nairobi, to be heard within the substantive succession cause. If the transfer cannot be effected due to technical limitations, the...

Court Disposition

Application for transfer of cause ordered; if transfer not possible, application dismissed and file closed.

Orders

  • This miscellaneous cause is to be transferred from the Busia registry to the Family Division registry at Milimani, Nairobi, to be heard within Milimani HCSC No. 987 of 2005.
  • If the transfer cannot be effected due to system limitations, the Motion stands dismissed and the file closed, to enable the applicants to move the court in Milimani HCSC No. 987 of 2005 for transfer.