[2021] KEHC 6950 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6950 (KLR)

The court found that the proposed distribution in the summons for confirmation was faulty, particularly as it included a non-existent asset (Kitengela land) and lacked evidence regarding the value or development status of certain properties. The court emphasized that, under Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6950 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Kariuki Njenga; Applicant: Anne Muthoni Njenga (Wambaa); Applicant: Catherine Njoki Njenga; Applicant: Edward Kinuthia Njenga; Respondent: Nancy Wambui Kamau; Respondent: AM (minor)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 148 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Protest
Outcome
Grant confirmed with modified distribution; protest partially allowed.
Judges
CW Meoli
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Minor Beneficiaries, Trusteeship, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Minor Beneficiaries Trusteeship Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Kariuki Njenga

Applicant

Anne Muthoni Njenga (Wambaa)

Applicant

Catherine Njoki Njenga

Applicant

Edward Kinuthia Njenga

Applicant

Nancy Wambui Kamau

Respondent

AM (minor)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Protest

  1. 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate is equitable and in accordance with the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the minor beneficiary AM is entitled to a distinct and separate share of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether the assets listed in the summons for confirmation are properly part of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposed distribution in the summons for confirmation was faulty, particularly as it included a non-existent asset (Kitengela land) and lacked evidence regarding the value or development status of certain properties. The court emphasized that, under Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, the estate should be distributed equally among the surviving children. However, due to the strained relationship between the protestor and the other beneficiaries, and to safeguard the minor AM's interests, the court ordered that AM receive a distinct share: land parcel LR No. Muguga/Kanyariri/521 and the deceased's savings/shares in Barclays Bank and Kiambu Unity Finance...

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed with modified distribution; protest partially allowed.

Orders

  • Land parcel LR No. Muguga/Kanyariri/521 and savings/shares in Barclays Bank and Kiambu Unity Finance Co-operative Society Ltd to be held in trust for minor AM by her mother and the administrators until majority.
  • LR. No. Sigona/153 to Edward Kinuthia Njenga.