[2022] KEHC 12663 (KLR)
The court found that proceeding to determine the applications as filed would result in serious injustice, as each party had only addressed one of the two applications in their submissions. This procedural confusion, caused by the filing of two separate applications on the same date, meant that neither party would...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 12663 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mwangi Njoroge Mwangi; Respondent: Rose Muthoni Njuguna; Interested Party: Peter Njoroge Gathogo & 18 others
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 19 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Preliminary Ruling on Hearing Directions
- Outcome
- File to be placed before another judge for fresh directions on hearing of both applications.
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Succession Procedure, Revocation of Grant, Confirmation of Grant, Conservatory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mwangi Njoroge Mwangi
Applicant
Rose Muthoni Njuguna
Respondent
Peter Njoroge Gathogo & 18 others
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Preliminary Ruling on Hearing Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can proceed to determine two separate applications filed on the same date but addressed differently in parties' submissions.
- 2 Whether proceeding with the determination would cause injustice to either party due to lack of full hearing on both applications.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that proceeding to determine the applications as filed would result in serious injustice, as each party had only addressed one of the two applications in their submissions. This procedural confusion, caused by the filing of two separate applications on the same date, meant that neither party would have a fair opportunity to be heard on both matters. To uphold the principles of fairness and justice, the court directed that the file be placed before another judge for fresh directions on the hearing of both applications, ensuring that both parties would be properly heard on all issues.
Court Disposition
File to be placed before another judge for fresh directions on hearing of both applications.
Orders
- This file be placed before any judge on a date to be granted for fresh directions on the hearing of the two applications.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
In re Estate of Jamric Kuuna alias Njuguna Chege (Deceased) (Succession Cause 19 of 2020) [2022] KEHC 12663 (KLR) (29 August 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 12663 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Murang'a
Succession Cause 19 of 2020
K Kimondo, J
August 29, 2022
Between
Mwangi Njoroge Mwangi
Applicant
and
Rose Muthoni Njuguna
Respondent
and
Peter Njoroge Gathogo & 18 others
Interested Party
Ruling
1. On December 23, 2020, the applicant filed two separate applications all dated December 18, 2020. The first is a Summons for revocation of grant issued by the subordinate court at Kigumo on February 19, 2015 and confirmed on December 5, 2019.
2. The second is a Notice of Motion seeking various conservatory orders or stay of execution of the certificate of confirmation of grant; and, also praying for transfer of the lower court file to the High Court.
3. The filing of both applications under a certificate of urgency on the same date and which also bear a similar date has led to considerable confusion. For instance, when the matter came up ex parte during the High Court Recess on December 30, 2020, the High Court sitting at Kerugoya (Mulwa J) ordered:Prayer 1 is granted. Application dated December 18, 2020 shall be served to the respondents and interested parties for hearing interparties on the January 21, 2021 at Murang’a High Court.
4. I have not seen a copy of the extracted order, but granted what I have stated, I presume the learned Judge granted Prayer 1 in the Notice of Motion brought under certificate of urgency seeking that the application “be certified urgent and heard ex partein the first instance”.
5. On April 28, 2021, learned counsel for both parties consented that the “application dated December 18, 2020 be heard by way of written submissions”.
6. On July 19, 2022, both learned counsel informed the court that they were relying wholly on their submissions filed on May 21, 2021 and July 6, 2022 respectively and sought a ruling date.
7. Which brings me to the predicament I faced when I retired to write the ruling: The applicant’s written submissions are devoted wholly to prayers 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Notice of Motion dated December 18, 2020. The respondents’ submissions on the other hand deal exclusively with the Summons for revocation of grant dated December 18, 2020.
8. Proceeding with a determination will cause serious injustice to either party as each of them will not have been heard on either of the two motions. Like I stated at the beginning, the quagmire has been engendered by filing of two separate applications which are all dated December 18, 2020.
9. To avoid the ends of justice from being defeated, and noting that I am proceeding on transfer, I direct that this file be placed before any judge on a date I shall now grant for fresh directions on the hearing of the two applications.It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022. KANYI KIMONDOJUDGEPreliminary Ruling read in open court in the presence of:Mr. Mbue Ndegwa holding brief for Mr. Pekke for the applicant instructed by Musungu Pekke & Company Advocates.Mr. Mbuthia for the respondents instructed by J. N. Mbuthia & Company Advocates.Ms. Susan Waiganjo, Court Assistant.