[2019] KEHC 10503 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 10503 (KLR)

The court determined that the estate of Japhet M’Itirithia should be distributed equally among the surviving children in accordance with Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, as the widow had also passed away. The court found no sufficient evidence to treat the 1st administrator's acquisition of certain plots as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 10503 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Martha Nkirote M’Itirithia; Respondent: Janet Karai Ndege; Respondent: Daniel Kaumbuthu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 340 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
grant confirmed; estate distributed as ordered; no order as to costs
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Dependants Definition, Gifts Inter Vivos, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Dependants Definition Gifts Inter Vivos Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martha Nkirote M’Itirithia

Applicant

Janet Karai Ndege

Respondent

Daniel Kaumbuthu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 How should the estate of Japhet M’Itirithia be distributed among the surviving beneficiaries under Kenyan succession law?
  2. 2 Should previous gifts or sales to beneficiaries be treated as gifts or purchases in the distribution of the estate?
  3. 3 Are all listed beneficiaries entitled to equal shares, including daughters and those previously gifted property?

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the estate of Japhet M’Itirithia should be distributed equally among the surviving children in accordance with Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, as the widow had also passed away. The court found no sufficient evidence to treat the 1st administrator's acquisition of certain plots as a sale, and thus treated these as gifts inter vivos, to be accounted for under Section 42. The court also noted that all children, including daughters, are entitled to equal shares, and that previous gifts or benefits must be considered in the final distribution. The court reviewed the proposed modes of distribution, found that the majority of beneficiaries had consented to the...

Court Disposition

grant confirmed; estate distributed as ordered; no order as to costs

Orders

  • The estate of Japhet M’Itirithia shall be distributed as specified in paragraph 11 of the judgment.
  • The grant is confirmed in the foregoing terms.