[2023] KEHC 2838 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 2838 (KLR)

The court found that the application for confirmation of grant could not be allowed because it lacked the support and consent of a majority of the beneficiaries, as required by the Probate and Administration Rules. The court emphasized that, in the absence of unanimous consent or properly filed protests, it is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 2838 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Emily Judith Odera; Respondent: Julius Onjiro Mapesa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 560 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application for confirmation of grant not allowed; matter to be set down for hearing with all beneficiaries present.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Consent of Beneficiaries, Probate and Administration Rules
Source Language
en
Family and Children Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Consent of Beneficiaries Probate and Administration Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emily Judith Odera

Applicant

Julius Onjiro Mapesa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the application for confirmation of grant can be allowed where not all beneficiaries have consented to the proposed distribution.
  2. 2 Whether the administratrix had capacity to bring the application for confirmation of grant.
  3. 3 Whether the matter can be determined by written submissions in the absence of consensus among beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for confirmation of grant could not be allowed because it lacked the support and consent of a majority of the beneficiaries, as required by the Probate and Administration Rules. The court emphasized that, in the absence of unanimous consent or properly filed protests, it is mandatory to set the matter down for hearing so that all beneficiaries can be heard. The court also noted that written submissions were inappropriate in the absence of consensus. Accordingly, the court declined to confirm the grant and directed that the matter be set down for hearing with all beneficiaries in attendance, in compliance with the relevant rules.

Court Disposition

Application for confirmation of grant not allowed; matter to be set down for hearing with all beneficiaries present.

Orders

  • Deputy Registrar to allocate a hearing date for the summons for confirmation of grant dated May 21, 2021, with all beneficiaries to attend before the Judge under Rule 41(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules.