[2024] KEHC 3421 (KLR)
The court held that the Law of Succession Act, specifically section 40, mandates that in cases of polygamous intestate succession, the estate must be divided among the houses based on the number of children in each house, with each surviving wife counted as an additional unit. The court found that the applicant's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 3421 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sarah Jepkemoi Mosonik
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration 348 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- Grant of letters of administration confirmed; estate to be distributed equally among all beneficiaries.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Polygamous Estates, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Jepkemoi Mosonik
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate should be allowed under the Law of Succession Act.
- 2 Whether the estate should be distributed equally among all beneficiaries in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Law of Succession Act, specifically section 40, mandates that in cases of polygamous intestate succession, the estate must be divided among the houses based on the number of children in each house, with each surviving wife counted as an additional unit. The court found that the applicant's initial proposed mode of distribution did not comply with the requirement of equal distribution among all beneficiaries. Instead, the court ordered that the estate, consisting of MOI’S BRIDGE/SIRIKWA BLOCK 1 (ZIWA) /447 measuring 30.08 acres, be distributed equally among all identified beneficiaries, each receiving 1.6 acres. This approach aligns with the statutory requirement...
Court Disposition
Grant of letters of administration confirmed; estate to be distributed equally among all beneficiaries.
Orders
- The grant of letters of administration dated 17.03.2014 issued to the petitioner is confirmed.
- The estate of the deceased, MOI’S BRIDGE/SIRIKWA BLOCK 1 (ZIWA) /447 measuring 30.08 acres, shall be distributed equally among all listed beneficiaries, each receiving 1.6 acres.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
44 paragraphs
In re Estate of Johanna Kipruto Mosonik (Deceased) (Probate & Administration 348 of 2013) [2024] KEHC 3421 (KLR) (11 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 3421 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Eldoret
Probate & Administration 348 of 2013
RN Nyakundi, J
April 11, 2024
In the matter of
Sarah Jepkemoi Mosnik
Petitioner
Ruling
1. What is pending in this matter is the distribution of the estate. The petitioner is the 2nd widow to the deceased and the Grant of Letters of Administration of the estate intestate were granted to her on 17. 03. 2014. Further, the same have been pending confirmation. The probate is uncontested as the application for revocation of grant dated 7th may 2015 was dismissed for want of prosecution.
2. The deceased was survived by the following beneficiaries;1st House1. Ruth Mosonik (Deceased) 1st Widow2. Leah Tuwei (Deceased)3. Daniel Kipng’eno Ruto (Deceased)4. Willy Kipkemboi Ruto (Deceased)5. Joseph Ruto (Deceased)6. Sarah Maritim7. David Kiplagat Mosonik8. Rebecca Jepkirui Kipruto9. Richard Kipkirui Ruto10. Isaiah Ruto Mosonik11. Emily Jelagat Mosonik2nd House1. Sarah Jepkemboi Mosonik 2nd widow2. Eunice Jepchumba Mosonik3. Noah Kipngetich Ruto4. Joel Ruto Mosonik5. Mathew Kipsang Mosonik6. Nancy Jemeli7. Selly Jepchirchir Mosonik8. Irene Jemutai Mosonik9. Erick Kipkorir
3. The deceased left behind one property known as MOI’S BRIDGE/SIRIKWA BLOCK 1 (ZIWA) /447 measuring 30. 08 acres.Pursuant to the directions of the court, the petitioner filed her affidavit proposing the mode of distribution as follows;The first house to get 15. 04 acres to be shared among the children of Leah Tuwei (Deceased); Sarah Maritim, the wife and children of Willy Kipkemboi Ruto, David Kiplagat Mosonik, Rebecca Jepkirui Kipruto, Richard Kipkirui Ruto, Isaiah Ruto Mosonik and Emily Jelagat Mosonik in equal shares.
4. The 2nd house to get 15. 04 acres which will be shared as follows; Sarah Jepkemboi Mosonik – 3 acres, Eunice Jepchumba Mosonik 0. 5 acres, Noah Kipngetich Ruto – 2. 51 acres, Joel Ruto Mosonik – 2. 51 acres, Mathew Kipsang Mosonik –2. 51 acres, Nancy Jemeli – 0. 5 acres, Selly Jepchirchir Mosonik – 0. 5 acres, Irene Jemutai Mosonik – 0. 5 acres and Erick Kipkorir – 2. 51 acres.
Analysis & Determination 5. The issue for determination herein is
Whether the proposed mode of distribution should be allowed 6. Distribution where the deceased was polygamous is governed by section 40 of the Law of Succession Act which states;1. Where an intestate has married more than once under any system of law permitting polygamy, his personal and household effects and the residue of the net intestate estate shall, in the first instance, be divided among the houses according to the number of children in each house, but also adding any wife surviving him as an additional unit to the number of children."
7. Considering a similar scenario, the Court in Re Estate Of John Musambayi Katumanga – Deceased [2014] eKLR held as follows:“The spirit of Part V, especially Sections 35, 38 and 40, is equal distribution, of the intestate estate amongst the children of the deceased. There have been debates on whether the distribution should be equal or equitable. My reading of these provisions is that they envisage equal distribution for the word used in Sections 35(5) and 38 is ‘equally’ as opposed to ‘equitably’. This is the plain language of the provisions. The provisions are in mandatory terms – the property “shall … be equally divided among the surviving children.” Equal distribution is envisaged regardless of the ages, gender and financial status of the children.”
8. It follows that the property of the deceased should be distributed considering each member of the family as a unit. Further, each unit is to receive an equal share of the property. The petitioner’s’ proposed mode of distribution clearly distributes the property of the deceased unequally among the beneficiaries.NAME OF HEIR SHARE OF ESTATE
Leah Tuwei (estate) 1. 6 acres
Daniel Kipng’eno Ruto (estate) 1. 6 acres
Willy Kipkemboi Ruto (estate) 1. 6 acres
Joseph Ruto (estate) 1. 6 acres
Sarah Maritim 1. 6 acres
David Kiplagat Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Rebecca Jepkirui Kipruto 1. 6 acres
Richard Kipkirui Ruto 1. 6 acres
Isaiah Ruto Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Emily Jelagat Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Sarah Jepkemboi Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Eunice Jepchumba Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Noah Kipngetich Ruto 1. 6 acres
Joel Ruto Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Mathew Kipsang Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Nancy Jemeli 1. 6 acres
Nancy Jemeli 1. 6 acres
Selly Jepchirchir Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Irene Jemutai Mosonik 1. 6 acres
Erick Kipkorir 1. 6 acres
9. In the premises, I proceed to confirm the grant of letters of administration dated 17. 03. 2014 issued to the petitioner. The estate of the deceased shall be distributed as follows;
10. It is my considered view that this distribution is in tandem with the provisions of the Law of Succession Act.
11. The administrators shall provide the court with the accounts of the estate after six months to confirm the distribution of the estate has been concluded.
12. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT ELDORET ON THIS 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024. .....................................R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE