[2023] KEHC 18585 (KLR)
The court held that, pursuant to its earlier judgment, only the members of the 2nd and 3rd houses were entitled to benefit from land parcel number 485, as the 1st house (including Joseph Ogola Abok and his dependants) had already been provided for with other parcels. The petitioner's attempt to include the 1st house...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 18585 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Juma Abok; Respondent: Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye; Respondent: Grace Ondu Ogola
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 212 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Mode of Distribution After Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- Application for inclusion of 1st house dependants in parcel 485 rejected; estate to be distributed as per respondent's proposal.
- Judges
- MS Shariff
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Juma Abok
Applicant
Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye
Respondent
Grace Ondu Ogola
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Mode of Distribution After Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether land parcel number 485 should be distributed among the 2nd and 3rd houses only, excluding the 1st house and its dependants.
- 2 Whether the proposed mode of distribution by the petitioner or the respondent accords with the law and prior court judgment.
- 3 Whether the principle of equality among beneficiaries under the Law of Succession Act applies to the distribution of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, pursuant to its earlier judgment, only the members of the 2nd and 3rd houses were entitled to benefit from land parcel number 485, as the 1st house (including Joseph Ogola Abok and his dependants) had already been provided for with other parcels. The petitioner's attempt to include the 1st house was rejected as contrary to the court's prior determination. The court further found that the principle of equality in distribution, as mandated by Sections 35, 38, and 40 of the Law of Succession Act, required that the estate be distributed equally among the rightful beneficiaries. The court adopted the mode of distribution proposed by Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye, which...
Court Disposition
Application for inclusion of 1st house dependants in parcel 485 rejected; estate to be distributed as per respondent's proposal.
Orders
- Land parcel number 485 to be distributed as follows: James Juma Abok - 1.26 Ha; Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye - 1.50 Ha; Japheth Ombok Dwasi, Fredrick Moses Siwa & John Abok Dwasi (jointly) - 0.68 Ha.
- Certificate of confirmation of grant to issue in these terms.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
In re Estate of John Abok Ogola (Deceased) (Succession Cause 212 of 1997) [2023] KEHC 18585 (KLR) (31 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 18585 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Succession Cause 212 of 1997
MS Shariff, J
May 31, 2023
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN ABOK OGOLA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE MODE OF DISTRIBUTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY;-
Between
James Juma Abok
Petitioner
and
Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye
Objector
and
Grace Ondu Ogola
Respondent
Ruling
1. This court delivered its judgement in the matter on November 21, 2019 appointing James Juma Abok as the sole administrator of the deceased’s estate. He was further ordered to file summons for the confirmation of grant within 30 days as of that day distributing the land parcel no. west Kisumu/Karateng/485 (hereinafter land ‘parcel number 485’) between the 2nd and 3rd houses.
2. Subsequently, the parties could not agree on the mode of distribution and the parties were directed to file their respective proposals on the mode of distribution.
3. The petitioner James Juma Abok proposed that his brother John Ayieya Abok having missed out on other parcels owned by the deceased, he was compensated with a bigger portion of land parcel number 485 where he has built his homestead. He depones that his brothers to wit Daudi Ogore was given land parcel Kisumu/Karateng/1295, Joseph Abok given land parcel Kisumu/Karateng/1291 and James Juma Abok given land parcel Kisumu/Karateng/1301 by the deceased prior to his death.
4. He depones that all the deceased’s sons are entitled to a portion of land parcel 485 and in case the said son has died, his dependants are entitled to a share in his place. He pointed out that the widow of his late brother Grace Ondu Ogola (wife to Joseph Ogola Abok) is entitled to a portion as the said brother had constructed a home in in his portion in parcel number 485. He thus proposes that parcel number 485 be distributed as had been allocated by their deceased father.
5. On her part Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayeye depones that the court had decreed that parcel number 485 be distributed between the 2nd and 3rd houses whilst the said Jospeh Ogola Abok comes from the 1st house and is therefore not entitled to a portion in that parcel. She depones that the 2nd house is made up of; Richard Dwasi (deceased) survived by Japheth Ombok Dwasi, John Abok Dwasi, Fredrick Moses Siwa, Rose Atieno Dwasi and Agneta Achieng Dwasi as well as Margaret Ojongo being the daughter of the deceased herein. The 3rd house is made up of James Juma Abok, Christine Ayieye and Risper Auma Abok.
6. Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayeye deposes that the 1st house was confined to Kisumu/Karateng/1291 and accuses the petitioner of drawing up the map of land parcel number 485 to include a share for Joseph Ondu Ogola despite the terms of the judgement. She asserts the portion meant for Joseph Ogola will secretly revert to the petitioner in the event that his proposed distribution schedule is adopted.
7. She thus proposes that land parcel 485 be distributed as follows;
8. James Juma Abok be allocated 1. 26 Ha, Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye to have 1. 50 Ha while Japheth Ombok Dwasi, Fredrick Moses Siwa and John Abok Dwasi to jointly own 0. 68 Ha.
Analysis and determination. 9. From the above proposed modes of distribution, I wish to first point out that pursuant to the judgement of the court stated above, the beneficiaries of land parcel number 485 are the members of the 2nd and 3rd households only since the court already found that the said Joseph Ondu Ogola had been provided for elsewhere. The petitioner’s plea that the dependants of Joseph Ogola be considered for allocation in land parcel number 485 is misplaced and is hereby rejected since the court had already pronounced itself on the subject.
10. I have also considered the two proposals by the petitioner and Christine which shows that the petitioner has dwelt so much in allocating portions out of parcel number 485 when the court had already made a determination on the same.
11. As it is, the 2nd house is comprised of the dependants of Richard Dwasi (deceased) and Margaret Ojongo and the 3rd house is comprised of the petitioner, Christine Ayieye and Risper Auma Abok who should rightly benefit from land parcel 485.
12. In the circumstances and regard being had to the fact that distribution of a deceased estate ought to be equal as mandated by Sections 35, 38 and 40 of Cap 160, I do find the proposed mode of distribution fronted by Christine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye to be in accord with this. Consequently, the deceased estate shall be distributed as follows;Beneficiary PortionJames Juma Abok 1. 26 HaChristine Rachel Aluoch Ayieye 1. 50 HaJapheth Ombok Dwasi, Fredrick Moses Siwa &John Abok Dwasi (Jointly) 0. 68 Ha
13. Consequently, a certificate of confirmation of grant do issue in the said terms.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KISUMU THIS 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023. MWANAISHA. S. SHARIFFJUDGE