[2017] KEHC 533 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 533 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as surviving administrator, retains the powers of an administrator under section 81 of the Law of Succession Act, but cannot avoid the responsibilities arising from the death of his co-administrator. The applicant failed to demonstrate efforts to involve the beneficiaries of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 533 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lawrence Kariuki Kabiro; Respondent: Rowland Gakuo Kabiro (deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 106 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Succession Application / Ruling on Summons General Seeking Dispensation of Signature and Substitution of Administrator
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Succession Administration, Grant of Letters Intestate, Administrator Substitution, Estate Transmission
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Administration Grant of Letters Intestate Administrator Substitution Estate Transmission

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lawrence Kariuki Kabiro

Applicant

Rowland Gakuo Kabiro (deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Application / Ruling on Summons General Seeking Dispensation of Signature and Substitution of Administrator

  1. 1 Whether the court should dispense with the signature of the deceased co-administrator and allow the Deputy Registrar to execute transmission documents.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient effort to involve the beneficiaries of the deceased co-administrator's estate.
  3. 3 Whether the application complies with section 81 of the Law of Succession Act regarding powers of surviving administrators.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as surviving administrator, retains the powers of an administrator under section 81 of the Law of Succession Act, but cannot avoid the responsibilities arising from the death of his co-administrator. The applicant failed to demonstrate efforts to involve the beneficiaries of the deceased co-administrator or to clarify the fate of that share of the estate. The law does not permit the transmission of the estate from one deceased person to another without proper substitution. Granting the orders sought would be prejudicial to the interests of the estate of the deceased co-administrator and contrary to the interests of justice. The application was therefore...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 12th April 2017 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.