[2019] KEHC 5242 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 5242 (KLR)

The court determined that, although the applicant has complied with the procedural requirements for confirmation of grant, substantive justice requires further inquiry to ensure that the children of the deceased and Jane Chepkoech Bosuben are identified and given an opportunity to claim their share of the estate....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 5242 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Juliah Muthoni; Respondent: Jane Bosumen Chepkoech (deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 259 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Summons for confirmation of grant held in abeyance pending further inquiry.
Judges
AG Ndung'u
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Letters of Administration, Estate Distribution, Beneficiary Identification
Source Language
en
Family and Children Confirmation of Grant Letters of Administration Estate Distribution Beneficiary Identification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Juliah Muthoni

Applicant

Jane Bosumen Chepkoech (deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate issued to Juliah Muthoni should be confirmed at this stage.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient inquiry has been made to identify and notify all potential beneficiaries, specifically the children of the deceased and Jane Chepkoech Bosuben.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, although the applicant has complied with the procedural requirements for confirmation of grant, substantive justice requires further inquiry to ensure that the children of the deceased and Jane Chepkoech Bosuben are identified and given an opportunity to claim their share of the estate. The absence of any claim from Jane's family does not absolve the court from its duty to protect the interests of all potential beneficiaries. Therefore, the confirmation of grant is held in abeyance pending further investigation by the provincial administration, specifically the chief of Lanet Location, to ascertain the whereabouts of the children. This approach balances the need...

Court Disposition

Summons for confirmation of grant held in abeyance pending further inquiry.

Orders

  • The summons for confirmation of grant is held in abeyance.
  • The chief Lanet Location is summoned to appear in court to shed light on the whereabouts of the children of the deceased and Jane Chepkoech Bosuben, with the letter from the Chief's office dated 17th June, 2004 annexed to the summons.