[2020] KEHC 10135 (KLR)
The court found that the will of the deceased was clear, valid, and unchallenged. The deed agreement signed by the beneficiaries, which sought to vary the distribution set out in the will, amounted to an attempt to alter or revoke the testator's wishes without legal basis. The court held that its duty is to enforce...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 10135 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Esther Nguhi Ndungu; Respondent: Beneficiaries of the Estate of John Mwaura Ndungu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 329 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- Grant of probate with will annexed confirmed; estate to be distributed as per the will.
- Judges
- JO Nyarangi
- Legal Topics
- Testate Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Will Construction, Variation of Will
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Nguhi Ndungu
Applicant
Beneficiaries of the Estate of John Mwaura Ndungu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should confirm the grant of probate with will annexed.
- 2 Whether the estate should be distributed as per the will or as per the deed agreement proposing equal distribution among beneficiaries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the will of the deceased was clear, valid, and unchallenged. The deed agreement signed by the beneficiaries, which sought to vary the distribution set out in the will, amounted to an attempt to alter or revoke the testator's wishes without legal basis. The court held that its duty is to enforce the intention of the testator as expressed in the will, and there were no reasonable grounds to depart from the will's provisions. Accordingly, the grant of probate with will annexed was confirmed, and the estate was ordered to be distributed strictly in accordance with the written will dated 1st August 2017.
Court Disposition
Grant of probate with will annexed confirmed; estate to be distributed as per the will.
Orders
- The grant of probate with will annexed is confirmed.
- The estate shall be distributed in accordance with the written will dated 1st August 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 329 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN MWAURA NDUNGU alias JOHN MWAURA NDUNG’U (DECEASED)
RULING
1. The Deceased herein died testate on 13th December 2017. He left behind a written Will dated 1st August 2017 in which he appointed his wife Esther Nguhi Ndungu as the sole executrix. The assets comprising the estate were bequeathed to various beneficiaries under the said will. On 15th March 2018, the executrix petitioned for grant of letters of probate with will annexed. The same was granted and issued on 13th July 2018.
2. Subsequently, the executrix filed an application dated 4th June 2020 seeking confirmation of the grant. She then sought to have the estate distributed as per a deed agreement signed by beneficiaries. Under the said deed, they sought variation of the will regarding distribution of the estate and instead proposed a fresh mode of distribution in which they urged the court to distribute the estate equally. The application is premised upon grounds on the face of it and affidavit in support sworn by the applicant.
3. I have considered the application herein and the affidavit in support. The grant of probate was issued on 13th July 2018. Since then, six months have lapsed without any objection being filed. In the circumstances, the grant of probate with will annexed is hereby confirmed. Regarding distribution of the estate, the will is clear. Its validity has not been challenged. A will is a legal expression or declaration of a testator’s wishes on how he or she wishes or desires to have his or her property shared out after his or her death.
4. The will herein is unequivocally clear and no other construction can be drawn other than to execute the intention of the testator. The role of the court is to construe the will to ascertain the intention of the maker and enforce the same (see Re Raphael: Public Trustee v Raphael (1972) EA 522). The deed of agreement between beneficiaries to distribute the estate equally amongst themselves is intended to alter, rewrite or revoke the will.
5. It is my finding that I do not find any reasonable ground to interfere with the wishes of the deceased which is clearly expressed in the will. Accordingly, the grant is hereby confirmed and the estate to be shared out as proposed by the deceased in the written will dated 1st August 2017.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020.
............................
J. N. ONYIEGO
JUDGE