[2023] KEHC 22087 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 22087 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of the two land parcels from the confirmed grant was an error that falls within the scope of rectification as provided under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. The administrator demonstrated the error, and all...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 22087 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Waweru Musa; Respondent: Rosemary Wanjiku Muthuu; Respondent: Ronah Nyambura Munyinyi; Respondent: Peter Gicharu Muthuo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 3506 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Application for rectification of grant allowed.
Judges
EKO Ogola
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Consent of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Consent of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Waweru Musa

Applicant

Rosemary Wanjiku Muthuu

Respondent

Ronah Nyambura Munyinyi

Respondent

Peter Gicharu Muthuo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the omission of land parcels Nairobi/block 120/250 and Nairobi/Block 120/251 from the confirmed grant constitutes an error subject to rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the court should allow rectification of the grant to include the omitted parcels and distribute them as proposed by the administrator.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of the two land parcels from the confirmed grant was an error that falls within the scope of rectification as provided under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. The administrator demonstrated the error, and all beneficiaries consented to the rectification and proposed distribution. The court, having reviewed the record, the consents, and the supporting documents, concluded that the rectification was justified and allowed the application as prayed.

Court Disposition

Application for rectification of grant allowed.

Orders

  • The certificate of confirmation of grant is rectified to include land parcels Nairobi/block 120/250 and Nairobi/Block 120/251 as part of the deceased's estate.
  • The said land parcels shall be distributed as specified in the application and consents.