[2019] KEHC 2446 (KLR)
The court found that both the applicant and the 1st respondent are recognized widows of the deceased and entitled to participate in the administration of the estate. The applicant has been in possession of the property in question since the deceased's death, while the 1st respondent resided elsewhere. To prevent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 2446 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Elizabeth Wanjiru Keguro; Respondent: Leah Waruguru Kerugo; Respondent: Zipporah Wanjiru Keguro
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 554 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Administration of Estate
- Outcome
- interlocutory injunction granted; directions on administration of estate issued
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Injunctive Relief, Estate Distribution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Wanjiru Keguro
Applicant
Leah Waruguru Kerugo
Respondent
Zipporah Wanjiru Keguro
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Administration of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st respondent should be restrained from interfering with the applicant's possession of L.R. Githunguri/Kanjai/1269 pending further orders.
- 2 Whether a fresh grant of representation should be issued to the applicant and 1st respondent as joint administrators.
- 3 Whether the parties should be directed to apply for confirmation of the grant for distribution of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both the applicant and the 1st respondent are recognized widows of the deceased and entitled to participate in the administration of the estate. The applicant has been in possession of the property in question since the deceased's death, while the 1st respondent resided elsewhere. To prevent further conflict and preserve the estate pending proper administration, the court restrained the respondents from interfering with the applicant's possession. The court further directed that a fresh grant of representation be issued to both the applicant and the 1st respondent as joint administrators, with an application for confirmation of the grant to be filed within 45 days to...
Court Disposition
interlocutory injunction granted; directions on administration of estate issued
Orders
- The defendants/respondents are restrained from trespassing, encroaching and interfering with the applicant’s possession and enjoyment of property number Githunguri/Kanjai 1269 pending further orders of the court.
- The applicant and the 1st respondent be issued with a fresh grant of representation as joint administrators of the estate herein. They will apply for confirmation of the grant within the next 45 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI
(FAMILY DIVISION)
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 554 OF 1998
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN PETER KEGURO (DECEASED)
ELIZABETH WANJIRU KEGURO....................PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
VERSUS
LEAH WARUGURU KERUGO............1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
ZIPPORAH WANJIRU KEGURO.......2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. The application subject of this ruling is dated and filed on 12th July 2018. The same was amended orally on the 18th of February 2019. It seeks to restrain the 1st Defendant/Respondent by herself and/or agents from interfering, trespassing, harassing, intimidating encroaching and or interfering with the Applicant’s possession of L.R. Githunguri/Kanjai /1269 pending further orders of the court.
2. Having looked at the proceedings this matter has several orders including a ruling made by Etyang J on the 30th July 1999 where he recognised the Applicant and the 1st Respondent as widows of the deceased at the time of death. There is a further order by Kimaru J dated 5th March 2019 where a grant earlier issued to the 1st and 2nd Respondents on the 1st of July 2013, and confirmed on 7th October, 2013 was revoked and parties directed to obtain fresh a grant.
An attempt to review the order of Etyang J by the 1st Respondent was declined on the 18th of November, 2014 and it appears that both widows thereafter went to slumber.
3. What I have derived from the averments of the parties is that at the time of the deceased death the Applicant resided on the property subject matter whereas the 1st Respondent resided elsewhere.
4. To avoid chaos and further altercation between the two families it would be prudent and reasonable to stop the construction by the 1st respondent for now, have grant obtained forthwith as earlier directed and thereafter an application for confirmation of the grant filed where distribution among the two families of the deceased may be done.
5. Consequently I make the following orders:
a) The Defendants/Respondents are hereby restrained from trespassing, encroaching and interfering with the Applicant’s possession and enjoyment of property number Githunguri/Kanjai 1269 pending further orders of the court.
b) The Applicant and the 1st Respondent be issued with a fresh grant of representation as joint administrators of the estate herein. They will apply for confirmation of the grant within the next 45 days
c) Costs in the cause.
Dated and Delivered in Nairobi on this 7TH day of NOVEMBER, 2019.
......................
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE