[2019] KEHC 1749 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 1749 (KLR)

The court found that the deceased had contracted a statutory and monogamous marriage with Anastacia Njeri Githaiga in 1984 under the African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act, which persisted until his death. This precluded him from having the legal capacity to contract a subsequent customary marriage with the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 1749 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Mukami Githaiga; Applicant: Edward Mbui Githaiga; Respondent: Perpetual Wangui Michuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Murang'a
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 276 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Protest dismissed; grant confirmed; estate distributed as per judgment.
Judges
K Kimondo
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Customary Marriage, Grant Confirmation, Distribution of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Intestate Succession Customary Marriage Grant Confirmation Distribution of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Mukami Githaiga

Applicant

Edward Mbui Githaiga

Applicant

Perpetual Wangui Michuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the protestor was lawfully married to the deceased under Gikuyu customary law.
  2. 2 Whether the protestor and her children are entitled to a share of the deceased's estate.
  3. 3 Whether the grant issued to the petitioners should be confirmed and the estate distributed as proposed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the deceased had contracted a statutory and monogamous marriage with Anastacia Njeri Githaiga in 1984 under the African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act, which persisted until his death. This precluded him from having the legal capacity to contract a subsequent customary marriage with the protestor. Even if some customary rites were performed, the purported marriage was void for all purposes. The protestor was not a lawful wife and her children from a previous marriage were not entitled to a share of the estate. The protest was dismissed, and the grant issued to the petitioners was confirmed. The estate was distributed among the lawful wife and children of the...

Court Disposition

Protest dismissed; grant confirmed; estate distributed as per judgment.

Orders

  • The protest is hereby dismissed.
  • The grant issued on 29th August 2014 to the 1st and 2nd petitioners is hereby confirmed under section 71 of the Law of Succession Act.