[2019] KEHC 12127 (KLR)
The court found that the administrators (1st and 2nd respondents) had failed to fulfill their statutory and court-ordered duty to distribute the estate to the beneficiaries as per the confirmed grant. The delay and lack of action by the administrators was unjustified, and the applicants' complaint was legitimate....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 12127 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Theresa Wanjiro Riunge; Applicant: Josephine Njeri Riunge; Respondent: Francis Kimani Gichuki; Respondent: David Muniu Riunge; Respondent: Francis Mburu Riunge
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 3079 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Compel Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Administration of Estates, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Theresa Wanjiro Riunge
Applicant
Josephine Njeri Riunge
Applicant
Francis Kimani Gichuki
Respondent
David Muniu Riunge
Respondent
Francis Mburu Riunge
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Compel Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administrators have failed in their duty to distribute the estate as per the confirmed grant.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to an order compelling the administrators to distribute the estate within a specified period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the administrators (1st and 2nd respondents) had failed to fulfill their statutory and court-ordered duty to distribute the estate to the beneficiaries as per the confirmed grant. The delay and lack of action by the administrators was unjustified, and the applicants' complaint was legitimate. The court held that it is the responsibility of the administrators to effect distribution, and in the event of continued non-compliance, the Deputy Registrar is empowered to effect the distribution on their behalf. The application was therefore allowed, and the administrators were given 60 days to comply.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The 1st and 2nd respondents (administrators) are given 60 days to distribute the estate to the beneficiaries in accordance with the certificate of confirmation.
- If the administrators fail to do so, the Deputy Registrar of the court is empowered to effect the distribution on their behalf.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 3079 OF 2002
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH GICHUKI RIUNGE (DECEASED)
THERESA WANJIRO RIUNGE.................................1ST APPLICANT
JOSEPHINE NJERI RIUNGE..................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
FRANCIS KIMANI GICHUKI............................1ST RESPONDENT
DAVID MUNIU RIUNGE.....................................2ND RESPONDENT
FRANCIS MBURU RIUNGE..............................3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The deceased Joseph Gichuki Riunge left two widows. Each widow had four children. The widows died subsequently. A grant of letters of administration intestate was issued to Francis Kimani Gichuki (1st respondent) and David Muniu Riunge (2nd respondent). There was a dispute regarding the distribution of the estate. Justice W. Musyoka heard the parties. On 9th July 2018 a decision was rendered distributing the estate. The land, properties and the money in the fixed deposits in the bank were to be each equally shared amongst the beneficiaries. The shares in the various companies were to be sold and the proceeds shared equally.
2. The 1st and 2nd respondents appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal. So far there is no stay.
3. The applicants Theresia Wanjiro Riunge and Josephine Njeri Riunge are beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased. Their case is that the respondents (including 3rd respondent Francis Mburu Riunge) have refused to distribute the estate as directed in the certificate of confirmation. In particular, the applicants are interested in Limuru/Bibirioni/246 which they want shared. They state that they prepared the respective transmission forms (RL 7 and RL 19) which they signed. The respondents were uncooperative. They did not sign or produce their KRA PIN, ID copies and passport photos to enable subdivision and transfer. It was also pleaded that the rest of the estate had not been shared owing to reluctance on the part of the respondents.
4. The respondents’ case was that the applicants are interested in only themselves when the entire estate was to be shared equally to all the beneficiaries. The respondents want the entire estate shared to all the beneficiaries as ordered, and not one property only to the applicants.
5. There is no indication why, since the grant was confirmed, the respondents have not distributed the estate, or even begun the process. It is because of the delay in the distribution that has caused anxiety on the part of the applicants. The complaint that the estate has not been shared since confirmation is a legitimate one.
6. I bear in mind that it is the responsibility of the administrators to distribute the estate to the beneficiaries once the grant issued to them has been confirmed, and the respective shares of the beneficiaries have been ascertained. Consequently, I allow the application. The 1st and 2nd respondents (who are the administrators of the estate of the deceased) are hereby given 60 days to distribute the estate to the beneficiaries in accordance with the certificate of confirmation, failing which the Deputy Registrar of this court is empowered to effect the distribution on their behalf.
7. I make no orders as to costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 27TH NOVEMBER 2019.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE