[2017] KEHC 3246 (KLR)
The court found that the administrator failed to disclose the existence of the deceased's predeceased son and his surviving family, constituting concealment of material facts and misrepresentation under the Law of Succession Act. This omission rendered the grant and its confirmation defective. However, rather than...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 3246 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Susan Waithira Kinyanjui; Respondent: Margaret Mumbi Kimani; Applicant: John Kabiru Njuguna
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 492 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Application for revocation of grant partially allowed; grant not revoked but amended to include omitted beneficiaries and co-administrator; confirmation of grant and subdivision of property annulled.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Non Disclosure of Beneficiaries, Revocation of Grant, Confirmation of Grant, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Waithira Kinyanjui
Applicant
Margaret Mumbi Kimani
Respondent
John Kabiru Njuguna
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts regarding the deceased's true beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether the omission of the deceased's predeceased son's family from the list of survivors invalidates the grant and its confirmation.
- 3 Whether the subdivision and transfer of estate property to third parties was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the administrator failed to disclose the existence of the deceased's predeceased son and his surviving family, constituting concealment of material facts and misrepresentation under the Law of Succession Act. This omission rendered the grant and its confirmation defective. However, rather than revoking the grant entirely, the court ordered that the omitted beneficiaries be included in the schedule of survivors and that the applicant be appointed as co-administrator. The court further vacated the confirmation of the grant, cancelled the certificate of confirmation, annulled the subdivision of the estate property, and directed the Land Registrar to revert the property...
Court Disposition
Application for revocation of grant partially allowed; grant not revoked but amended to include omitted beneficiaries and co-administrator; confirmation of grant and subdivision of property annulled.
Orders
- The twelve survivors of John Njuguna Kinyanjui to be entered into the schedule of survivors of the deceased.
- John Kabiru Njuguna appointed as co-administrator with Margaret Mumbi Kimani.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 492 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH KINYANJUI
GOIYO alias KINYANJUI GOIYO (DECEASED)
RULING
1. The deceased herein died on 6th December 2003. A letter from the Chief of Gatamaiyu Location, dated 9th February 2004, shows that the deceased had been predeceased by his wife, and was survived by his two daughters, Susan Waithira Kinyanjui and Margaret Mumbi Kimani. Susan Waithira Kinyanjui petitioned for representation intestate to the estate of the deceased in a petition filed herein on 25th February 2004. The deceased was expressed to have been survived by the two daughters, and to have died possessed of only one asset, Gatamaiyu/Kagwe/569.
2. A grant of letters of administration intestate was made to Susan Waithira Kinyanjui, on 26th April 2004. Susan Waithira Kinyanjui died on 23rd May 2013, and she was substituted with her sister Margaret Mumbi Kimani as administrator by an application dated 18th July 2013. A grant was made to her dated 29th October 2013. The grant was confirmed on 30th July 2014, on an application dated 10th June 2014. The entire estate devolved wholly upon the administrator, Margaret Mumbi Kimani. A certificate of confirmation of grant in those terms dated 30th July 2014.
3. On 8th March 2015, a summons for revocation of grant dated 22nd February 2015 was lodged herein by John Kabiru Njuguna. He is a grandson of the deceased. He alleges that the grant on record was obtained fraudulently, for some of the survivors of the deceased were not disclosed. It was said that the deceased had three children, the two daughters disclosed, and a son, John Njuguna Kinyanjui, who was not disclosed. The said son had predeceased the deceased, but was survived by a widow and eleven children; all listed in a letter dated 25th February 2016 in the hand of the Assistant-Chief for Kamahindu Sub-Location, Gatamaiyu Location.
4. In reply the administrator concedes that the applicant is a grandchild of the deceased through her late brother, John Njuguna Kinyanjui. She says that she intended to have her late brother’s share in the estate devolved to his widow, and therefore there was no intent to disinherit anyone.
5. The law is very clear, at section 51 of the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160, Laws of Kenya, all the surviving children of the deceased ought to be disclosed. In the instant case, the petitioner only listed herself and her sister as the sole survivors. It was not disclosed that the deceased had a son who was dead and who had been survived by a family of twelve. That was concealment of matter from court and it was a case misrepresentation. A grant is liable to revocation for such non-disclosure. It paints the grant-holder as a dishonest person in whom trust and confidence cannot reside.
6. What is more, the administrator had the grant confirmed; the entire estate was devolved upon herself as the sole survivor of the deceased. This was no doubt in breach of the proviso to section 71(2), which requires that the grant is not to be confirmed unless the court is satisfied as to the respective identities and shares of all beneficially entitled, and when confirmed the certificate should specify all such persons and their shares. The administrator presented herself at confirmation as the only survivor; she did not disclose the other survivors or their respective shares. This no doubt was an attempt to disinherit the family of his late brother.
7. In her replying affidavit, the administrator indicates that she subdivided the property, and devolved parts of it to strangers. None of it was devolved to the estate of her late brother. It is not stated the circumstances under which the strangers got to be entitled to a share in the estate. If they were benefited as creditors, it is not disclosed whether the debts were left by the deceased, or were incurred by the administrator. If they benefited as buyers, it is not indicated from whom they bought a portion of the property, whether it was the deceased who sold to them, or whether the transactions were with the administrator.
8. In this case, I shall not revoke the grant herein; instead I shall direct that the twelve survivors of John Njuguna Kinyanjui be entered into the schedule of survivors of the deceased herein. I shall further direct that the applicant herein, John Kabiru Njuguna, be appointed as co-administrator of the estate with Margaret Mumbi Kimani. The grant on record shall be amended accordingly. I shall direct that the orders that confirmed the grant on 30th July 2014 be vacated and the certificate of confirmation of grant of even date be cancelled. That I also hereby annul the subdivision of Gatamaiyu/Kagwe/569, and direct the Land Registrar responsible for Kiambu County to recall all the tile deeds issued out of the alleged subdivision for cancellation, and to revert the property to the position it was in as at 30th July 2014. The administrators shall apply afresh for the confirmation of the amended grant.
9. The application dated 22nd February, 2015 is disposed of in the terms proposed in paragraph 8 hereabove. The estate is comprised of assets situated exclusively out of Nairobi and within Kiambu County. This cause shall therefore be transferred to the High Court of Kenya at Kiambu for final disposal. The applicant shall have costs of the application.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE