[2018] KEHC 729 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 729 (KLR)

The court found that Harrison Maina Ndiritu, the petitioner, had failed to disclose material facts by not indicating the existence of Zacharia Mumburi Matu, a son of the deceased, in the petition for grant of letters of administration. The evidence, including letters from local chiefs and the form P&A 5, established...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 729 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Zacharia Mumburi Matu; Respondent: Harrison Maina Ndiritu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant and Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application allowed; grant revoked; new grant to applicant
Judges
AG Ndung'u
Legal Topics
Succession, Revocation of Grant, Priority of Heirs
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Revocation of Grant Priority of Heirs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zacharia Mumburi Matu

Applicant

Harrison Maina Ndiritu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant and Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to Harrison Maina Ndiritu was obtained through non-disclosure or concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether Zacharia Mumburi Matu is a rightful heir and entitled to a grant of letters of administration over the estate of Joshua Wanjohi Matu.
  3. 3 Whether transfers of title made pursuant to the revoked grant should be declared null and void.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Harrison Maina Ndiritu, the petitioner, had failed to disclose material facts by not indicating the existence of Zacharia Mumburi Matu, a son of the deceased, in the petition for grant of letters of administration. The evidence, including letters from local chiefs and the form P&A 5, established that the petitioner was a grandson and not the only heir. The court held that the grant was obtained through non-disclosure and concealment, and therefore could not stand. The applicant, being a son of the deceased, had priority in the administration of the estate. Consequently, the grant issued to the petitioner was revoked, any transfers made pursuant to the grant were...

Court Disposition

application allowed; grant revoked; new grant to applicant

Orders

  • The grant of letters of administration issued on 10/3/2011 and confirmed on 19/10/2011 is revoked.
  • Any transfer of title by the petitioner to himself or to a third party pursuant to the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 10/10/2011 in Nyahururu Principal Magistrate’s Succession Cause Number 124 of 2010 is declared null and void and cancelled forthwith.