[2019] KEHC 8265 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 8265 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had disclosed the fact that the land in question was transferred to Catherine Amoit Emukule and that if he did not have vacant possession at the time of transfer, he could not have given it. The court held that it was simplistic to argue that the applicant had no interest in the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 8265 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jefta Osokayese Murunga; Respondent: Washington Itori Kirade; Respondent: Samuel Omukule Kirade; Respondent: Jacob Ipapo Kirade; Respondent: Leah Idionyi Kirade
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Application 36 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Succession Application / Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed with orders.
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Right to Inherit, Vacant Possession, Interest in Land
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession Proceedings Right to Inherit Vacant Possession Interest in Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jefta Osokayese Murunga

Applicant

Washington Itori Kirade

Respondent

Samuel Omukule Kirade

Respondent

Jacob Ipapo Kirade

Respondent

Leah Idionyi Kirade

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Succession Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has an interest in land parcel number NORTH TESO/KOCHOLIA/13 forming part of the estate of the deceased.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents are obligated to file a succession cause in respect of the estate of David Kirande (deceased).

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had disclosed the fact that the land in question was transferred to Catherine Amoit Emukule and that if he did not have vacant possession at the time of transfer, he could not have given it. The court held that it was simplistic to argue that the applicant had no interest in the land, given the existence of a valid court order in his favour. Consequently, the court ordered the respondents to file a succession cause in respect of the estate of David Kirande (deceased) within 60 days, failing which the applicant would be at liberty to do so.

Court Disposition

Application allowed with orders.

Orders

  • Respondents to file a succession cause in respect of the estate of David Kirande (deceased) within 60 days.
  • If respondents fail to file, the applicant is at liberty to do so.