[2021] KEHC 6363 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6363 (KLR)

The court found that the application for review and rectification was properly grounded in law, supported by documentary evidence, and that the errors in the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant were typographical and did not affect the substance of the grant. The substitution of the deceased beneficiary's name with...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6363 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Johnson Maina Githira; Applicant: William Kamau Githira; Applicant: Francis Irungu Githira; Respondent: Ngacha Githira
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 278 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A Mshila
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant Rectification, Beneficiary Substitution, Probate Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant Rectification Beneficiary Substitution Probate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johnson Maina Githira

Applicant

William Kamau Githira

Applicant

Francis Irungu Githira

Applicant

Ngacha Githira

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court should allow correction of typographical errors in the name of the administrator on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants should be substituted as beneficiaries in place of their deceased mother.
  3. 3 Whether the application for review and rectification meets the requirements under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) and 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for review and rectification was properly grounded in law, supported by documentary evidence, and that the errors in the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant were typographical and did not affect the substance of the grant. The substitution of the deceased beneficiary's name with those of the applicants was justified, as was the correction of the administrator's name to reflect the actual grant. The court was satisfied that the requirements under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rules 43(1) and 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules were met, and therefore allowed the application for review and rectification.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The name of Wamuyu Githira (deceased) is substituted with the names of Johnson Maina Githira, William Kamau Githira, and Francis Irungu Githira as beneficiaries to her portion in the estate.
  • The name of the petitioner on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued on 23/08/2011 is corrected to read Ngacha Githira instead of Wanjugu Githira and Wamuyu Githira.