[2021] KEHC 6363 (KLR)
The court found that the application for review and rectification was properly grounded in law, supported by documentary evidence, and that the errors in the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant were typographical and did not affect the substance of the grant. The substitution of the deceased beneficiary's name with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 6363 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Johnson Maina Githira; Applicant: William Kamau Githira; Applicant: Francis Irungu Githira; Respondent: Ngacha Githira
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 278 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Rectification of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- A Mshila
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant Rectification, Beneficiary Substitution, Probate Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johnson Maina Githira
Applicant
William Kamau Githira
Applicant
Francis Irungu Githira
Applicant
Ngacha Githira
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Rectification of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should allow correction of typographical errors in the name of the administrator on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant.
- 2 Whether the applicants should be substituted as beneficiaries in place of their deceased mother.
- 3 Whether the application for review and rectification meets the requirements under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) and 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for review and rectification was properly grounded in law, supported by documentary evidence, and that the errors in the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant were typographical and did not affect the substance of the grant. The substitution of the deceased beneficiary's name with those of the applicants was justified, as was the correction of the administrator's name to reflect the actual grant. The court was satisfied that the requirements under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rules 43(1) and 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules were met, and therefore allowed the application for review and rectification.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The name of Wamuyu Githira (deceased) is substituted with the names of Johnson Maina Githira, William Kamau Githira, and Francis Irungu Githira as beneficiaries to her portion in the estate.
- The name of the petitioner on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued on 23/08/2011 is corrected to read Ngacha Githira instead of Wanjugu Githira and Wamuyu Githira.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.278 of 2002
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE KARIUKI MAINA alias KARIUKI S/O MAINA(DECEASED)
JOHNSON MAINA GITHIRA
WILLIAM KAMAU GITHIRA
FRANCIS IRUNGU GITHIRA.......................APPLICANTS/BENEFICIARIES
VS
NGACHA GITHIRA...........................................................................PETITIONER
RULING
1. The application is dated the 2/07/2020 and is premised under the provisions of Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules; the applicants seek to correct the typographical errors in the names of the administrator of the estate; and also seek a review of the Order issued on the 23/08/2013 so as to remove the name of a deceased beneficiary and to substitute themselves in place of the deceased beneficiary;
2. The application is supported by the grounds on the face of the application and on the Supporting Affidavit dated 2/07/2020 made by WILLIAM KAMAU GITHIRA; therein he depones that he is a co-administrator of his late mother’s estate and has been duly authorized by his brothers who are also co-administrators to make the affidavit;
3. The applicant deposes that their mother WAMUYU GITHIRA passed away on the 5/01/2016 and prays that her name be substituted with the applicants names on the list of the beneficiaries to the estate of the deceased, herein; a copy of the Death Certificate and a copy of the LIMITED GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AD LITEM are annexed in support of the application;
4. They further seek for the correction of the typographical errors in the name of the petitioner on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued on 23/08/2013 to conform with the name on the GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION DE BONIS NON issued on the 28/10/2011; that two names appear on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant, namely WANJUGU GITHIRA and WAMUYU GITHIRA whereas on the GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION DE BONIS NONit only bears one name which is that of NGACHA GITHIRA;
5. The correct position is that the GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION DE BONIS NONwas issued in the sole name of the petitioner NGACHA GITHIRAand not jointly as reflected on the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued on 23/08/2013;
6. The applicants pray that the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant be corrected to include the name of the correct administrator and that their names be also included as beneficiaries in place of their deceased mother who was a beneficiary, herein;
7. The applicable law is found at Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) and 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules – ; Section 74 of the Act and Rule 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules allow a party who has discovered new and important matter(s) or evidence after the orders were made to apply for review to the court that issued the orders; Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules allows for the correction of errors provided that it does not affect the substance of the Grant;
8. Upon reading the application and hearing the submissions of counsel appearing for the applicants, this court is satisfied that the name of the petitioner was erroneously captured on the CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF GRANT issued on 23/08/2011 and that the prayers sought for review and rectification of the afore-going Order are as envisaged under the aforesaid provisions of Law; the application is properly supported by copies of the Death Certificate, the LIMITED GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AD LITEM,the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant and the GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION DE BONIS NON;
9. For those reasons this court finds that this is a proper case for granting of the order for review and rectification; the application is therefore found to be meritorious and is hereby allowed.
10. The order granted on the 23/08/2011 is hereby reviewed and rectified as follows;
(i)The name of WAMUYU GITHIRA (deceased) be and is hereby substituted with the names of JOHNSON MAINA GITHIRA, WILLIAM KAMAU GITHIRA and FRANCIS IRUNGU GITHIRAas beneficiaries to her portion in the estate of the deceased;
(ii)The name of the petitioner on the CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF GRANT issued on 23/08/2011 be and is hereby corrected to read NGACHA GITHIRA instead of WANJUGU GITHIRA and WAMUYU GITHIRA.
Orders Accordingly
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY AT NYERI THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021.
HON. LADY JUSTICE A. MSHILA
JUDGE