[2024] KEHC 6006 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6006 (KLR)

The High Court found that the application by the 2nd objector for cancellation of title deeds was res judicata, as the same issues had already been determined by the Court of Appeal, which dismissed the application and declined to cancel the titles. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to revisit matters...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6006 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Christopher Orina Kenyariri; Applicant: Vincent Mosongo Kenyariri; Respondent: Edward Obino Kenyariri; Respondent: James Bichage Kenyariri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 3 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications to Set Aside Inhibition Orders and Cancel Title Deeds
Outcome
Petitioner's application allowed; objector's application dismissed.
Judges
PN Gichohi
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Grant of Letters of Administration, Land Inhibition Orders, Title Cancellation, Res Judicata, Jurisdiction of High Court
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Administration of Estates Grant of Letters of Administration Land Inhibition Orders Title Cancellation Res Judicata Jurisdiction of High Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Orina Kenyariri

Applicant

Vincent Mosongo Kenyariri

Applicant

Edward Obino Kenyariri

Respondent

James Bichage Kenyariri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications to Set Aside Inhibition Orders and Cancel Title Deeds

  1. 1 Whether the High Court should set aside inhibition orders placed on LR Nos. Nyaribari Chache/Keumbu/6027, 6028, 6029, 6030, 6031 and 6032.
  2. 2 Whether the application for cancellation of title deeds is res judicata and whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain it.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the application by the 2nd objector for cancellation of title deeds was res judicata, as the same issues had already been determined by the Court of Appeal, which dismissed the application and declined to cancel the titles. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to revisit matters conclusively settled by the appellate court. With the appellate proceedings concluded and the inhibition orders having served their purpose, the court determined that it was just and equitable to set aside the inhibition orders to allow the beneficiaries to benefit from the estate. The court relied on its inherent powers under Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules to make...

Court Disposition

Petitioner's application allowed; objector's application dismissed.

Orders

  • Objector’s application dated 08/05/2023 is dismissed.
  • Petitioner’s application dated 24/04/2023 is allowed.