[2021] KEHC 4235 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 4235 (KLR)

The court held that an applicant has the liberty to withdraw an application at any stage before the court's determination, and there was no compelling reason to refuse the withdrawal in this case. The withdrawal was deemed not prejudicial to the interests of justice, especially as the respondents had not filed a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 4235 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gichero Kibanya; Applicant: Michael Njeru Kibanya; Applicant: Mary Wanjira Kibanya; Respondent: Peter Kibanya Gichero; Respondent: Benson Wachira Kibanya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1357 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Withdrawal of Application
Outcome
Application marked as withdrawn; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
FN Muchemi
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Withdrawal of Application, Preliminary Objection, Costs in Succession, Administration of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Withdrawal of Application Preliminary Objection Costs in Succession Administration of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gichero Kibanya

Applicant

Michael Njeru Kibanya

Applicant

Mary Wanjira Kibanya

Applicant

Peter Kibanya Gichero

Respondent

Benson Wachira Kibanya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Withdrawal of Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to withdraw the application dated 15th April 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the withdrawal of the application affects the pending preliminary objection.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the withdrawn application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that an applicant has the liberty to withdraw an application at any stage before the court's determination, and there was no compelling reason to refuse the withdrawal in this case. The withdrawal was deemed not prejudicial to the interests of justice, especially as the respondents had not filed a substantive response but only a preliminary objection. Given the nature of succession proceedings and to avoid unnecessary acrimony among family members, the court exercised its discretion to order that each party bear their own costs. The application dated 15th April 2021 was accordingly marked as withdrawn.

Court Disposition

Application marked as withdrawn; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The application dated 15th April 2021 is marked as withdrawn.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs.