[2025] KEHC 2682 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 2682 (KLR)

The court found that it was functus officio, having already determined the substantive issues in the succession cause. Further, by virtue of Article 162(2) of the Constitution, the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application. The preliminary objection on jurisdiction was upheld, and the application dated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 2682 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Kipngeno Mutai; Applicant: Sammy Kipkemoi Rono; Applicant: Recho Kombich; Respondent: Annah Chepkorir Mutai; Respondent: Alice Ngetich
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bomet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 24 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application
Outcome
application struck out; matter closed
Judges
JK Ng'arng'ar
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Functus Officio, Probate and Administration
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Functus Officio Probate and Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Kipngeno Mutai

Applicant

Sammy Kipkemoi Rono

Applicant

Recho Kombich

Applicant

Annah Chepkorir Mutai

Respondent

Alice Ngetich

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application in light of Article 162(2) of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the court is functus officio in the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it was functus officio, having already determined the substantive issues in the succession cause. Further, by virtue of Article 162(2) of the Constitution, the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application. The preliminary objection on jurisdiction was upheld, and the application dated 16/4/2024 was struck out. The matter was marked as closed, and notice was to issue to the parties.

Court Disposition

application struck out; matter closed

Orders

  • The application dated 16/4/2024 is struck out.
  • Notice to issue to the parties.