[2009] KEHC 1836 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 1836 (KLR)

The court found that the objectors, Mary Njeri Kiiru and Lucy Wangechi Kiiru, failed to prove that they were unaware of the confirmation of grant or that their signatures were forged. There was no substantive evidence to support their claims of fraud or concealment of material facts. The court noted that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 1836 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Njeri Kiiru; Applicant: Lucy Wangechi Kiiru; Respondent: Samuel Anthony Mbogo Kiiru; Respondent: Elvis Wanjohi Kiiru (deceased, represented by widow Lucy Wandia); Respondent: Mary Wanjeri Kiiru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Cause 3032 & 2445 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant dismissed; partial review of estate division ordered; grants in Succession Cause No. 2445/01 revoked; rectified certificate of confirmation to issue; administrators to file accounts; no order as to costs.
Judges
KH Rawal
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Beneficiaries Rights, Fraudulent Concealment
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Revocation of Grant Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Beneficiaries Rights Fraudulent Concealment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Njeri Kiiru

Applicant

Lucy Wangechi Kiiru

Applicant

Samuel Anthony Mbogo Kiiru

Respondent

Elvis Wanjohi Kiiru (deceased, represented by widow Lucy Wandia)

Respondent

Mary Wanjeri Kiiru

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the grant of representation and certificate of confirmation should be revoked on grounds of fraud or concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the objectors were excluded from the confirmation process or their consent was forged.
  3. 3 How the estate of the deceased should be distributed among the beneficiaries, including the interests of the second house and minor children.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the objectors, Mary Njeri Kiiru and Lucy Wangechi Kiiru, failed to prove that they were unaware of the confirmation of grant or that their signatures were forged. There was no substantive evidence to support their claims of fraud or concealment of material facts. The court noted that the objectors had been enjoying their shares of the estate without objection until the application for revocation was filed, undermining their credibility. The court also considered the welfare of the minor children from the second house, noting that they had not been adequately provided for. Consequently, while declining to revoke the certificate of confirmation in Succession Cause No....

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant dismissed; partial review of estate division ordered; grants in Succession Cause No. 2445/01 revoked; rectified certificate of confirmation to issue; administrators to file accounts; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Application for revocation of certificate of confirmation in P.& A. No.3032/01 dismissed except for review of division as directed.
  • 10% of the shares of both administrators to be given to the second house, held by Mary Wanjeri Kiiru in life interest and in trust for her three children in equal shares.