[2019] KEHC 11726 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11726 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had complied with the previous court order regarding release of funds to the applicant, as evidenced by a consent and final payment signed by the applicant. The estate had already been fully distributed, and the properties in question were registered in the names of beneficiaries...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11726 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Wanjeri Kiiru; Respondent: Lucy Wandia
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 3032 & 2445 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Application for Compliance, Release of Funds, and Injunction
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Distribution of Estate, Injunctive Relief, Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Administration of Estates Distribution of Estate Injunctive Relief Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Wanjeri Kiiru

Applicant

Lucy Wandia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Application for Compliance, Release of Funds, and Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the respondent complied with the court order dated 22nd September 2009 regarding release of funds to the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to injunctive orders restraining the respondent from dealing with the estate properties.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's advocate is properly on record for the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had complied with the previous court order regarding release of funds to the applicant, as evidenced by a consent and final payment signed by the applicant. The estate had already been fully distributed, and the properties in question were registered in the names of beneficiaries who were not parties to the application. The applicant's advocate had not obtained leave to come on record, and the previous advocate had not been served. As such, the application was overtaken by events, and the injunctive orders sought could not be granted against parties not before the court. The application was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 17th September 2018 as amended on 17th October 2018 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.