[2018] KEHC 1946 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 1946 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated, through official documentation and affidavits, that the omitted properties were indeed assets of the deceased. The court was satisfied that all beneficiaries had consented to the rectification and the proposed distribution. The inclusion of Machakos/Nziuni/404...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 1946 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Monicah Kimuyu; Applicant: Geoffrey Kioko; Respondent: Doreen Nthenya; Respondent: Jane Ndungwa; Respondent: Ann Kanini; Respondent: Jackline Ndunge; Respondent: Purity Syombua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 262 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Application for Rectification of Confirmed Grant
Outcome
Application for rectification of grant allowed.
Judges
EM Muriithi, GV Odunga
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Consent of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Consent of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monicah Kimuyu

Applicant

Geoffrey Kioko

Applicant

Doreen Nthenya

Respondent

Jane Ndungwa

Respondent

Ann Kanini

Respondent

Jackline Ndunge

Respondent

Purity Syombua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Application for Rectification of Confirmed Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate should be rectified to include additional assets omitted during confirmation.
  2. 2 Whether the omitted assets are lawfully part of the deceased's estate and available for distribution.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of all beneficiaries justifies the rectification and distribution as proposed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated, through official documentation and affidavits, that the omitted properties were indeed assets of the deceased. The court was satisfied that all beneficiaries had consented to the rectification and the proposed distribution. The inclusion of Machakos/Nziuni/404 was justified by evidence that it had been sold to the deceased but not transferred before the seller's death, and was not available for distribution in the seller's estate. The court therefore held that the rectification was proper and ordered the inclusion of the specified assets in the estate to be distributed to Monicah Kimuyu in whole share, in accordance with the...

Court Disposition

Application for rectification of grant allowed.

Orders

  • The assets Machakos/Nziuni/404, 427, 440, 426; Kali market, Mbooni market, Kithetheni plot 2 (shop), and Standard Chartered Bank A/C 01501-058188-01 are included as assets of the deceased's estate.
  • The included assets shall be distributed in accordance with the consent of the beneficiaries, in the name of Monicah Kimuyu, the widow, in whole share.