[2011] KEHC 1578 (KLR)
The court found that the assets of the estate had already been distributed and transmitted to the respective beneficiaries in accordance with a prior judgment, and that the administration of the estate was complete. The applicant's claim that the grant had become useless and inoperative due to the death of a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1578 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Josphat Nguchia Kinyua; Applicant: George Gichohi Kinyua; Respondent: Nancy Wangechi Wanguhu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 348 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Summons for Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Injunctive Relief, Grant Confirmation, Land Distribution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Josphat Nguchia Kinyua
Applicant
George Gichohi Kinyua
Applicant
Nancy Wangechi Wanguhu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Summons for Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be restrained from entering, subdividing, or interfering with the specified land parcels during the pendency of the succession cause.
- 2 Whether the land registrars should be restrained from registering documents relating to the disputed parcels during the pendency of the case.
- 3 Whether the grant has become useless and inoperative due to the death of a beneficiary.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the assets of the estate had already been distributed and transmitted to the respective beneficiaries in accordance with a prior judgment, and that the administration of the estate was complete. The applicant's claim that the grant had become useless and inoperative due to the death of a beneficiary was rejected, as there was no evidence to support this assertion. The court held that there was no merit in the application for injunctive relief, as the applicant had not demonstrated any legal basis for restraining the respondent or the land registrars from dealing with the estate assets. The application was therefore dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The summons dated 12th May 2011 is dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 348 OF 2011
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
KINYUA GICHOHI ……………………………………….DECEASED
AND
GEORGE GICHOHI KINYUA
JOSPHAT NGUCHIA KINYUA……...……….....……....APPLICANT
VERSUS
NANCY WANGECHI WANGUHU……….…………..RESPONDENT
RULING
This ruling is the outcome of the summons dated 12th May 2011 in which Josphat Nguchia Kinyua, the 2nd Applicant herein has sought for the following orders:
That the Respondent herein, her servants, agents and/or families be restrained from entering and/or interfering with the land parcel Nos. KIINE/KIANGAI/483, IRIAINI/GATUNDU/468 and Plot no. IRIAINI/GATUNDU/425/5 with the intention of sub dividing or doing destruction of anything else during the pendency of the above case.
That the Land Registrars in Kirinyaga and Nyeri be restrained from registering any documents in respect of the above lands during the pendency of this case.
The cost of this application e provided for.
The summons is supported by the affidavit of Josphat Nguchia Kinyua. Nancy Wangechi Wanguhu, the Respondent herein, and George Gichohi Kinyua each opposed the summons by filing a replying affidavit they swore on 2nd June 2011 and 6th June 2011 respectively.
The applicant alleged that the Respondent came to subdivide L.R. no. Kiine/Kiangai/483 on 11th May 2011 without his consent. He alleged that he protested to confirmation of the grant vide Karatina S.R.M.C. SUCC. Cause no. 20 of 2007 but his protest was dismissed.
The Respondent opposed the summons claiming that the same is without any shred of merit. She pointed out that the applicant and the respondent were both in the succession cause in respect of the estate of Kinyua Gichohi, deceased before the Karatina S.R.M.’s court. It is said the applicant was unhappy with the mode of distribution decreed by the Karatina S.R.M’.s court thus he preferred an appeal before this court vide Nyeri H.C.C.A. 20 of 2007. The appeal was heard and dismissed by the honourable Lady Justice Kasango in her judgment delivered on 18th July 2008.
I have perused the copy of the judgment of Lady Justice Kasango and it is clear that the following assets of the estate were distributed as follows:
(i)L.R. no. Kiini/Kiangai/483:
Medi Njoki Kinyua
Nancy Wangechi Wanguhu - 1. 358 acres.
Josphat Nguchia Kinyua - 1. 358 acres.
(ii)L.R. no. Iriaini/Gatundu/469:
Medi Njoki Kinyua
Nancy Wangechi Wanguhu 1. 456 acres.
Josphat Nguchia Kinyua - 1. 456 acres.
(iii)L.R. no. Iriaini/Gatundu/425/5
Medi Njoki Kinyua
(iv) Shares with Barclays Bank (k) Ltd.
Medi Njoki Kinyua.
There is no doubt that the parcels of land must be subdivided to complete the administration of hate estate. Instead of filing an appeal against this court’s judgment, the applicant has instead filed a summons for revocation of grant. It is the submission of the Applicant that the grant has become useless and in operative because of the death of Medi Njoki Kinyua. It is alleged she died on 1st February 2011. There is clear evidence that the administration of the estate is complete. The suit premises have been subdivided and transmitted to the respective beneficiaries hence it is not true that the grant has become useless and inoperative.
In the end I see no merit in the summons. The same is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
Dated and delivered this 29th day of July 2011
J.K. SERGON
JUDGE.
In open court in the presence of Miss Mwai holding brief Muthigani for the Respondent. No appearance for the Applicant