[2023] KEHC 20629 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 20629 (KLR)

The court found that the proposed mode of distribution by the petitioner was discriminatory against female beneficiaries, contrary to the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution. Section 40 of the Act requires equal treatment of all children and surviving wives in polygamous intestate succession. The Constitution...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 20629 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: John Kipsang Korir; Objector: Mary Jebet Kipkoech
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E077 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate After Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
The court ordered equal distribution of the deceased's estate among all surviving beneficiaries, rejecting the petitioner's discriminatory proposal.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Polygamous Estates, Gender Equality Inheritance, Distribution of Estate, Rights of Daughters, Customary Law Vs Statute
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Polygamous Estates Gender Equality Inheritance Distribution of Estate Rights of Daughters Customary Law Vs Statute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kipsang Korir

Petitioner

Mary Jebet Kipkoech

Objector

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate After Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate is fair and compliant with the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the objector and other female beneficiaries are entitled to equal shares of the estate as male beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether customary law or discriminatory practices can override statutory and constitutional guarantees of equality in inheritance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposed mode of distribution by the petitioner was discriminatory against female beneficiaries, contrary to the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution. Section 40 of the Act requires equal treatment of all children and surviving wives in polygamous intestate succession. The Constitution mandates equality and prohibits discrimination based on gender. The court rejected customary practices that deprive daughters or widows of inheritance rights, holding that such customs are unconstitutional and unenforceable. The court ordered an equal distribution of the estate among all surviving beneficiaries, regardless of gender, and disregarded unproven claims to certain...

Court Disposition

The court ordered equal distribution of the deceased's estate among all surviving beneficiaries, rejecting the petitioner's discriminatory proposal.

Orders

  • The estate of the deceased is to be distributed equally among all listed surviving beneficiaries, each receiving 1.87 hectares of the respective properties.
  • The parcel known as Kipkabus Settlement Scheme is excluded from distribution for lack of evidence of ownership by the deceased.