[2024] KEHC 929 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 929 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established his entitlement to a specific share of the estate land as evidenced by the certificate of confirmation of grant. The respondents, having failed to respond or attend the hearing, did not contest the applicant's claims of interference. The court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 929 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Williamson Cheruiyot Ngeno; Respondent: Joseph Kipngetich Koskei; Respondent: Esther Chepkemoi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 323 'B' of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Injunction
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Intermeddling With Estate Property, Injunctive Relief, Transmission of Title
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Administration of Estates Confirmation of Grant Intermeddling With Estate Property Injunctive Relief Transmission of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Williamson Cheruiyot Ngeno

Applicant

Joseph Kipngetich Koskei

Respondent

Esther Chepkemoi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to restraining orders against the respondents from interfering with his apportioned share of the estate land measuring 1.79 acres.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents' actions constitute intermeddling with the estate property in contravention of the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established his entitlement to a specific share of the estate land as evidenced by the certificate of confirmation of grant. The respondents, having failed to respond or attend the hearing, did not contest the applicant's claims of interference. The court held that the applicant is entitled to peaceful possession of his apportioned share and that the respondents' actions amounted to intermeddling with estate property. Accordingly, the court granted an injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the applicant's 1.79 acres pending transmission and title processing, and ordered the respondents to bear the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Pending the transmission of shares and processing of title deeds of the estate land of Kericho/Kapsaos/881 as per certificate of confirmation of grant issued by this court on 18th July, 2017, the respondents are hereby restrained from interfering with the rightful share of the applicant herein measuring 1.79 acres...
  • The costs of this application be borne by the respondents.