[2020] KEHC 6400 (KLR)
The court found that the deceased had, prior to his death, subdivided and allocated his land assets among all ten households, and all beneficiaries (except Anyesi) accepted and settled on their respective portions. The court held that this prior subdivision was valid and binding, as it reflected the deceased's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 6400 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Anyesi Chepkoech Chepkoimet; Respondent: Johana Kipkirui Soi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Mode of Distribution of Estate Assets
- Outcome
- Grant of letters of administration confirmed; estate to be distributed as per deceased's subdivision and family meeting minutes.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Polygamous Estates, Distribution of Estate, Customary Law, Confirmed Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anyesi Chepkoech Chepkoimet
Applicant
Johana Kipkirui Soi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Mode of Distribution of Estate Assets
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased's estate should be distributed equally among all children or according to the subdivision made by the deceased before his death.
- 2 Whether the prior subdivision and settlement of land by the deceased is valid and binding on all beneficiaries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the deceased had, prior to his death, subdivided and allocated his land assets among all ten households, and all beneficiaries (except Anyesi) accepted and settled on their respective portions. The court held that this prior subdivision was valid and binding, as it reflected the deceased's wishes and had been acted upon for over 24 years. The statutory framework under section 40 of the Law of Succession Act would only apply in the absence of such a prior valid distribution. Since Anyesi was not excluded from the deceased's arrangements and was allocated 2.6 hectares in Transmara/Njipishi/1080, the court found no basis to disturb the existing arrangement. The fairest...
Court Disposition
Grant of letters of administration confirmed; estate to be distributed as per deceased's subdivision and family meeting minutes.
Orders
- Anyesi Chepkoech Chepkoimet to receive 2.6 hectares on land parcel No. Transmara/Njipishi/1080.
- All other beneficiaries to receive their agreed shares as per the minutes of the family meeting held on 8th March 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT BOMET
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.2 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KIPSOI ARAP CHEPKOMET (DECEASED)
ANYESI CHEPKOECH CHEPKOIMET..........................................PETITIONER
AND
JOHANA KIPKIRUI SOI......................................................................OBJECTOR
RULING
1. This Succession matter was filed in Kericho High Court in 2012, before it was transferred to Bomet High Court in 2017.
2. The issue currently in contest is the mode of distribution of the deceased’s assets among ten (10) households, as there were 10 wives of the deceased. Two different proposed modes of distribution were filed and Mrs. Kirui and Mr. Mugumya agreed that this court gives its ruling on distribution of the assets of the deceased herein, which are land assets.
3. I note that the main difference in the two proposed modes of distribution is that Mr. Mugumya’s client (Anyesi) maintains that the land assets be distributed equally among children, while the other nine (9) houses maintain that the land was subdivided by the deceased, and should be distributed as such among the houses and beneficiaries.
4. Distribution of the assets of a deceased person in an intestate polygamous family is governed by the provisions of section 40 of the Law of Succession Act (Cap.160), which provides as follows -
“40. (1) Where an intestate has married more than once under any system of law permitting polygamy, his personal and household effects and the residue of the net intestate estate shall, in the first instance, be divided among the houses according to the number of children in each house, but also adding any wife surviving him as an additional unit to the number of children.
(2) The distribution of the personal and household effects and the residue of the net intestate estate within each house shall then be in accordance with the rules set out in section 35 and 38.
5. Though generally speaking, the above statutory provisions apply, courts have long held that an African can divide his property to his dependants or beneficiaries before death, and that such division of assets is valid and effective.
6. In the present case, all the contesting parties herein agree that the deceased divided the land and settled members of all the 10 houses on various portions of his land assets, both in Kericho County and Transmara County as per the minutes of the family meeting held on 8th March, 2019 attended by both counsel Mrs. Milcah Kirui and Mr. Rogers Mugumya. It was recorded in those minutes that the only person who opposed to the division of assets by the deceased was Anyesi Chepkoech Chepkoimet, who though she agreed that the deceased showed them the land boundaries, maintained that she was no longer interested in those boundaries because she had suffered for 18 years.
7. I note that from the facts disclosed in the documents filed, that she had disagreed with the deceased before he died, and had relocated to her family of origin, but attended his funeral. Though the other beneficiaries say that she should get 2. 6 hactares of land in Transmara/Njipishi/1080, she maintains that each of the land assets be divided equally among all the beneficiaries.
8. In my view, since it is not disputed even by Anyesi Chepkomet that the deceased divided the land and settled everybody there before he died on 13th April 1996, which is more than 24 years now, that subdivision is the fairest mode of distribution of the assets herein, because the deceased had already distributed his estate before he died and did not leave out anybody, including Anyesi Chepkoech.
9. I thus order that Anyesi Chepkoech will get 2. 6 hactares on land parcel No. Transmara/Njipishi/1080, and the rest of the beneficiaries will get the agreed shares of the land per the minutes of the meeting of 8th March 2019. I thus confirm the grant or representation of letters of administration herein.
10. Certificate of confirmed grant of letters of administration will issue with the mode of distribution of assets as above.
Dated this 29th day of April 2020.
GEORGE DULU
JUDGE
Delivered through video conferencing in the presence of Mr. Langat court assistant, Mr. Musyoka ICT officer and Mr. Mugumya for petitioner (Anyesi)