[2018] KEHC 2395 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, being an adult, has the capacity to have her share of the estate registered in her own name. There was no dispute regarding her entitlement to a share of the deceased's estate. The court determined that there was no reason for her share to be registered jointly with the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2395 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eddah Nyakio Kathuni; Respondent: Cecily Wambui Gatimu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 437 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- LW Gitari
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Review of Court Orders, Beneficiary Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eddah Nyakio Kathuni
Applicant
Cecily Wambui Gatimu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have her share of the estate registered in her name independently.
- 2 Whether the grounds for review of the confirmation of grant have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, being an adult, has the capacity to have her share of the estate registered in her own name. There was no dispute regarding her entitlement to a share of the deceased's estate. The court determined that there was no reason for her share to be registered jointly with the respondent. Additionally, the existence of the applicant's minor child, who was not previously mentioned in the proceedings, was noted, and the court considered it in the best interest of the child that the applicant be given her portion independently. The application for review was found to have merit, and the grant was ordered to be reviewed so that the applicant's share is listed in...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The grant is reviewed to have the share of the applicant, Eddah Nyakio Kathuni, listed in her name.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 437 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KIRIRO GATIMU (DECEASED)
AND
EDDAH NYAKIO KATHUNI..................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
CECILY WAMBUI GATIMU..............................RESPONDENT
RULING
The applicant Eddah Nyakio Kathuni has filed an application dated 22/02/2018 seeking review of the confirmation of grant issued on 15/12/2016. That she was registered jointly with the respondent yet she is an adult who can be registered on her own.
According to the respondent, the applicant was present in court when the grant was was confirmed and she consented to the said distribution. That the applicant has a baby son called Wachania Nyakio and if the court is inclined to remove her name, she humbly request that the said portion be registered jointly between the applicant and the minor child.
Grounds for applying for review
Review can only be allowed under certain circumstances. It is not in all cases that you are allowed to apply for review. The grounds are:
i) Discovery of new and important matter of evidence which, after exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or the Order made
ii) Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record
iii) Any other sufficient reason which may make the court to review its order.
Application for review of decree or order is made under Section 80 Civil Procedure ActandOrder 45 Civil procedure Rules.
Order 45 rule -1- Civil Procedure Rules relates to issues of facts which may arise from the evidence. The rule talks of discovery of new and important matter or evidence or mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or for any other sufficient reason. The discovery referred to does not in my view relate to issues of law but must relate to facts and that is why the rule refer to discovery of facts as opposed to law.
Rule 63 Probate and Administration rules provides for application of Civil Procedure Rule which includes Order XLIV (now order 45 Civil Procedure Rules 2010). Furthermore rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules provides:
“Nothing in these Rules shall limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the court.”
The applicant is an adult who has capacity to have the land registered in her name. There is no dispute that she was entitled to a share of the estate of the deceased. There is therefore no reason why her share should not be registered in her name. It has also come out from the evidence that the applicant has a child who was not mentioned in the proceedings. It is in the best interest of the child that the child be catered for. This would be done if the applicant is given her portion. The applicant Eddah Nyakio Kathuni was named as a beneficiary and since she is an adult, there is no reason why she should not get her share independently without being tied to Cecily Wambui the respondent. I find that the application has merits. The grant will be reviewed to have the share of the applicant listed in her name. I make no orders as to costs.
Dated at Kerugoya this 11th Day of October 2018.
L. W. GITARI
JUDGE