[2025] KEHC 9092 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of a stay of execution. The existence of parallel proceedings in the Environment and Land Court (Kapsabet ELC No. E014/2023) concerning the ownership of L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49, coupled with the fact that the parcel is registered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 9092 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: 1st and 4th Administrators/Applicants; Respondent: 2nd Administrator/Respondent
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 53 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Hearing
- Outcome
- stay of execution granted pending hearing and determination of ELC proceedings
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Conflicting Court Orders, Succession Disputes, Land Ownership, Trust Land, Parallel Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
1st and 4th Administrators/Applicants
Applicant
2nd Administrator/Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending the determination of Kapsabet ELC No. E014/2023.
- 2 Whether the ruling of the trial court is unenforceable due to conflicting orders regarding L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49.
- 3 Whether the interests of justice require suspension of execution until ownership of the disputed land is resolved.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of a stay of execution. The existence of parallel proceedings in the Environment and Land Court (Kapsabet ELC No. E014/2023) concerning the ownership of L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49, coupled with the fact that the parcel is registered in the name of a third party and is also subject to a government claim as trust land, created a real risk of conflicting court orders. The court held that the succession court could not conclusively determine ownership of the disputed land, and that the interests of justice required that execution of the trial court's ruling be stayed pending the outcome of the ELC proceedings....
Court Disposition
stay of execution granted pending hearing and determination of ELC proceedings
Orders
- Pending the hearing and determination of this summons inter-parties, there is a stay of execution of the ruling delivered by the trial court on 1st April 2025 and all its consequential orders.
- Witness summons to issue to the surveyors who visited the suit property to carry out a topographic survey and boundary measurements to adduce evidence before this court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
In re Estate of Kitur Chepsungulgei (Deceased) (Civil Case 53 of 2020) [2025] KEHC 9092 (KLR) (27 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 9092 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Eldoret
Civil Case 53 of 2020
RN Nyakundi, J
June 27, 2025
IN THE ESTATE OF KITUR CHEPSUNGULGEI (DESEASED)
Ruling
1. Before this court is an application dated 7th day of April 2025 seeking the following orders:a.Spent.b.That pending the hearing and determination of this summons inter-parties, there be stay of execution of the ruling delivered by the trial court on 1st April 2025 and all its consequential ordersc.That pending the hearing and determination of Kapsabet ELC no. E014/2023, there be stay of execution of the ruling delivered on 1st April 2025 and all its consequential ordersd.That the costs of this summons be in the cause
2. The application is anchored on grounds that:a.That the 1st and 4th Administrators/Applicants are dissatisfied with the ruling of the trial court delivered on 1st April 2025b.That the distribution in the above ruling includes L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49 which is currently registered in the name of a 3rd party, the late Malakwen Cheptallam Rotich hence rendering the above ruling unenforceable.c.That there exist parallel succession proceedings distributing the aforesaid parcel of land to the beneficiaries of the late Malakwen Cheptallam Rotich vide Eldoret High Court Succession Cause no. E001 of 2022 hence creating a quagmire on execution of the impugned rulingd.That further to the above L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49 is also being claimed by the government having been declared trust land on 16th June 1962. e.That the issued of ownership can only be legally ventilated vide Kapsabet ELC No. E014/2023 which suit is pending hearing and final disposalf.That the trial court in reaching its impugned ruling placed reliance on the averments made the 2nd Administrator/Respondent oblivious of the fact that he is a party in Kapsabet ELC No. E014/2023g.That in the above circumstances, there are in force two conflicting orders in favour of the beneficiaries herein and the beneficiaries of the late Malakwen Cheptallam Rotich over L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49 hence rendering the impugned unenforceable in the circumstancesh.That in the foregoing the best interest of justice will be served only after ownership of L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49 which all the Administrators deem as having been irregularly declared a trust land is ventilated by the environment and lands court, vide ELC no. E014/2023i.That occupation/possession of the disputed parcel of land (L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49) by some of the beneficiaries of the estate herein does not constitute ownership as observed by the impugned rulingj.That the respondents may commence execution of the aforesaid ruling within the 90 days period provided by the trial court in its ruling hence compromising the outcome of L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49 which is pending hearing and determination on meritk.That there is a possibility of the two courts of concurrent jurisdiction issuing conflicting orders hence rendering stay of execution of the ruling delivered on 01/04/2025 necessary in the circumstancesl.That no prejudice will be suffered by respondents who will have their entitlements enforced after the conclusion of Kapsabet ELC No. E014/2023 especially since the status quo has obtained since the deceased herein passed away in the year 1980m.That ends of justice will be served by allowing this application prayed
Orders 3. Based on the strength of this application the following orders shall abide:a.That pending the hearing and determination of this summons inter-parties, there be stay of execution of the ruling delivered by the trial court on 1st April 2025 and all its consequential ordersb.That witness summons due issue to the surveyors who visited the suit property to carry out a topographic survey together with boundaries settings and measurements to adduce evidence before this court.c.In addit ion the land Registrar of Nandi county is also summoned to attend court to provide the executive summary as indicated in the green card and other accountable registry of instruments with regard to L.R No. Nandi/Cheptil/49d.That the two expert witnesses be served with witness summons issued by the Deputy Registrar to give appropriate perspectives on the subject matter. The hearing herein has been scheduled on the 10th of July 2025. It is so ordered
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT THIS 27THDAY OF JUNE 2025………………………………………R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE