[2017] KEHC 2002 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2002 (KLR)

The court found that since the grant in respect of the estate of Aziz Kurbanali Shamasdin was withdrawn and there is currently no administrator for that estate, it is not possible to grant the orders sought by the applicant. The court emphasized that the existence of an administrator is a legal prerequisite for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2002 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Abdulkarim K. Shamasdin; Respondent: Arif Aziz Shamasdin
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1942 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Execution of Vesting Assent and Transmission of Property
Outcome
application declined
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Probate and Administration, Grant Resealing, Vesting Assent, Will Interpretation, Estate Distribution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Probate and Administration Grant Resealing Vesting Assent Will Interpretation Estate Distribution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdulkarim K. Shamasdin

Applicant

Arif Aziz Shamasdin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Execution of Vesting Assent and Transmission of Property

  1. 1 Whether the administrator of the estate of Aziz Kurbanali Shamasdin can be compelled to execute the vesting assent for Flat No. 74 to enable transmission to the beneficiary as per the deceased's Will.
  2. 2 Whether the court can order registration of the property in the names of Abdulkarim K. Shamasdin and Arif Aziz Shamasdin as administrators.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of an administrator in the estate of Aziz Kurbanali Shamasdin precludes granting the orders sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the grant in respect of the estate of Aziz Kurbanali Shamasdin was withdrawn and there is currently no administrator for that estate, it is not possible to grant the orders sought by the applicant. The court emphasized that the existence of an administrator is a legal prerequisite for the execution of a vesting assent and the transmission of property in a succession matter. The Will of the deceased clearly provided for equal division of the estate between the two sons, and this has not been challenged. However, the applicant's remedy regarding the validity of the transfer of the 0.5 share in Flat No. 74 lies in the Commercial Court, not in the Succession Court....

Court Disposition

application declined

Orders

  • The application is declined as there is no administrator in the estate of Aziz Kurbanali Shamasdin.
  • No orders as to costs.