[2018] KEHC 8080 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8080 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated, through documentary evidence (Certificate of Postal Search), that the deceased owned a 1/14 share in Plot L.R 36/250/1 (Eastleigh), which was inadvertently omitted from the schedule of assets in the original petition and confirmed grant. The omission was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 8080 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cecilia Wairimu Kimondo; Respondent: George Kimani Kimondo; Respondent: David Karanja Kimondo; Respondent: Paul Waithaka Kimondo; Respondent: Simon Gichuki Kimondo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 434 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application for rectification of grant allowed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Omitted Assets, Succession Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Omitted Assets Succession Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cecilia Wairimu Kimondo

Applicant

George Kimani Kimondo

Respondent

David Karanja Kimondo

Respondent

Paul Waithaka Kimondo

Respondent

Simon Gichuki Kimondo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of representation should be rectified to include the omitted property 1/14 share of Plot L.R 36/250/1 (Eastleigh).
  2. 2 Whether the newly discovered property should be distributed equally among the beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated, through documentary evidence (Certificate of Postal Search), that the deceased owned a 1/14 share in Plot L.R 36/250/1 (Eastleigh), which was inadvertently omitted from the schedule of assets in the original petition and confirmed grant. The omission was not deliberate and was only discovered after the grant had been confirmed. The court held that rectification of the grant was warranted to ensure all assets of the deceased are properly administered and distributed. The court further determined that the omitted property should be shared equally among the beneficiaries, consistent with the distribution of the rest of the estate. The...

Court Disposition

application for rectification of grant allowed

Orders

  • The property 1/14 share of Plot L.R 36/250/1 (Eastleigh) is included in the list of assets of the deceased.
  • The grant issued on 28th September 2007 is rectified to include the said property.