[2023] KEHC 23689 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 23689 (KLR)

The court found that the application dated February 5, 2019 seeking execution of the certificate of confirmation of grant had been overtaken by events due to the issuance of a rectified certificate of confirmation of grant and a subsequent order of stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 23689 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Andrew Cheruiyot; Petitioner: Stanley Cheruiyot; Petitioner: Anna C Mataget
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 220 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Execute Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Confirmation of Grant, Stay of Execution, Rectification of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Confirmation of Grant Stay of Execution Rectification of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Cheruiyot

Petitioner

Stanley Cheruiyot

Petitioner

Anna C Mataget

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Execute Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the application dated February 5, 2019 seeking execution of the certificate of confirmation of grant is merited in light of subsequent court orders.
  2. 2 Whether the existence of a stay of execution order pending appeal renders the application an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application dated February 5, 2019 seeking execution of the certificate of confirmation of grant had been overtaken by events due to the issuance of a rectified certificate of confirmation of grant and a subsequent order of stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. The existence of the stay order precluded any further execution or proceedings on the grant, rendering the application devoid of merit. The court therefore dismissed the application, holding that it could not grant the orders sought while the stay of execution was in force.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated February 5, 2019 is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.