[2022] KEHC 10645 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10645 (KLR)

The court confirmed that all parties had complied with previous directions regarding the filing of documents in both the objections and the contempt application. While contempt applications are typically prioritized, the court noted its heavy docket and the need to allocate time for the matter. The court considered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10645 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Brenda Nyambura Kiragu; Respondent: Jane Alice Wambui Kiragu; Respondent: Silas Macharia Kariuki; Interested Party: Sarah Mukuhi Nginyo Kariuki; Interested Party: Scholastic Njeri Kariuki; Interested Party: Rose Wanjiru Kariuki; Interested Party: Margaret Wangari Nginyo Kariuki; Interested Party: James Anthony Kariuki; Interested Party: Alex Ndoria Karuri; Interested Party: Austine Wachira Karungo; Interested Party: Winfred Kariuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 336 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Directions
Outcome
Directions issued for the disposal of the contempt application and objections; matter to be fixed for hearing.
Judges
HI Ong'udi
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Contempt of Court, Case Management, Objection Hearing
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Contempt of Court Case Management Objection Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brenda Nyambura Kiragu

Applicant

Jane Alice Wambui Kiragu

Respondent

Silas Macharia Kariuki

Respondent

Sarah Mukuhi Nginyo Kariuki

Interested Party

Scholastic Njeri Kariuki

Interested Party

Rose Wanjiru Kariuki

Interested Party

Margaret Wangari Nginyo Kariuki

Interested Party

James Anthony Kariuki

Interested Party

Alex Ndoria Karuri

Interested Party

Austine Wachira Karungo

Interested Party

Winfred Kariuki

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Directions

  1. 1 Whether all parties have complied with previous court directions regarding filing of documents in the objections and contempt application.
  2. 2 How the application for contempt of court and the objections should be scheduled and disposed of procedurally.
  3. 3 Whether the directions of the Court of Appeal regarding expedition of the matter should influence the current scheduling.

Ratio Decidendi

The court confirmed that all parties had complied with previous directions regarding the filing of documents in both the objections and the contempt application. While contempt applications are typically prioritized, the court noted its heavy docket and the need to allocate time for the matter. The court considered the Court of Appeal's direction to expedite the hearing and determination of the issues related to the estate, so that any aggrieved party may appeal. Accordingly, the court issued directions: the contempt application is to be disposed of by written submissions, with timelines for filing and serving submissions by both sides; objections will be heard by viva voce evidence; and...

Court Disposition

Directions issued for the disposal of the contempt application and objections; matter to be fixed for hearing.

Orders

  • The contempt of court application dated 11th April 2022 to be disposed of by way of written submissions.
  • Applicants and those supporting the application to file and serve their submissions within ten days.