[2023] KEHC 23358 (KLR)
The court found that South Teso/Apokor/1215 did not belong to the deceased and had already been expunged from the estate by a prior consent order. There was no evidence of any other assets forming part of the estate. As a result, the grant issued to the administratrix had become useless and inoperative, as there was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 23358 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Getruda Ilungat Ikolongi; Respondent: Objectors (unnamed)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 447 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Closure and Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Grant revoked and succession cause closed due to absence of estate assets.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Estate Administration, Ownership of Land, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Getruda Ilungat Ikolongi
Applicant
Objectors (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Closure and Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property South Teso/Apokor/1215 formed part of the deceased's estate for distribution.
- 2 Whether the grant issued to the administratrix should be revoked for lack of estate assets.
- 3 Whether the succession cause should be closed due to absence of assets.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that South Teso/Apokor/1215 did not belong to the deceased and had already been expunged from the estate by a prior consent order. There was no evidence of any other assets forming part of the estate. As a result, the grant issued to the administratrix had become useless and inoperative, as there was nothing left to administer. The court therefore revoked the grant under section 76(e) of the Law of Succession Act and ordered the closure of the file, with liberty to reopen should assets be discovered in the future.
Court Disposition
Grant revoked and succession cause closed due to absence of estate assets.
Orders
- The grant made on 23rd May 2012 to Getruda Ilungat Ikolongi is revoked for being useless and inoperative under section 76(e) of the Law of Succession Act.
- The Deputy Registrar shall close the court file and move it to the archives.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
In re Estate of Lazaro Ikolong Ogema (Deceased) (Succession Cause 447 of 2011) [2023] KEHC 23358 (KLR) (13 October 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 23358 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Succession Cause 447 of 2011
WM Musyoka, J
October 13, 2023
Ruling
1. When this matter came up for mention on 28th September 2023, Mr. Were, Advocate for the objectors, invited the court to close the file. He stated that orders had been made on 15th July 2014 expunging the only asset listed in the petition from the record, on grounds that it did not belong to the deceased, and, therefore, did not form part of his estate. He asserted that the objectors had no more business in the matter, and if there was no other asset in the estate, the court file should be closed.
2. Mr. Makokha, who is the Advocate on record for the administratrix, did not attend court, and no explanation was offered to counter the submissions by Mr. Were. Mr. Makokha was in court on 14th June 2023, when he pleaded for more time to consult the administratrix over the issue.
3. The property in contention is South Teso/Apokor/1215. According to a certificate of official search filed herein, dated 20th December 2011, the same was registered in the name of Etoro Ogema, on 9th August 1977. There is a letter on record, from the Chief of Kaujakito Location, dated 14th October 2011. It explains that the deceased was a brother of the registered proprietor, and that he and the registered proprietor both occupied South Teso/Apokor/1215. The proprietor died in 1974, leaving the deceased herein in occupation until his death in 2011. The Chief refers to a land disputes tribunal verdict which awarded a portion of South Teso/Apokor/1215 to the widow of the deceased.
4. The grant herein was made to a daughter of the deceased, on 23rd May 2012. She caused South Teso/Apokor/1215 to be distributed on 14th March 2013, between herself and 3 others, vide a summons for confirmation of grant dated 9th January 2013. A certificate of confirmation of grant was subsequently issued, in those terms, dated 15th March 2013.
5. The objectors herein, who ideally are applicants, then filed a summons for revocation of grant, on 11th July 2013, dated 9th July 2013. Their case was that South Teso/Apokor/1215 did not belong to the deceased herein, and, therefore, did not form part of his estate. They asserted that the deceased and their father, Etaro Ogema, were different individuals. They stated that the decision of the land disputes tribunal that the administratrix was relying on had been quashed by the High Court in Busia HCJR No. 8 of 2012. The application was resolved by consent of the parties, vide an order recorded on 15th July 2014, before F. Tuiyott J. The confirmation orders of 15th March 2013 were set aside, the transmission of South Teso/Apokor/1215 in accordance with those confirmed orders was cancelled, the property was reverted to the name of Etaro Ogema, and South Teso/Apokor/1215 was removed from the schedule of assets in the succession cause herein.
6. A copy of a judgment in Busia ELC No. 43 of 2015, delivered on 27th June 2019, has been placed on record. The suit was between the widow of the deceased herein and a son of Etaro Ogema, over South Teso/Apokor/1215, where the court found that the deceased herein was not entitled to a customary trust in the said property, as none had been established or proved.
7. Since 15th July 2014, nothing concrete has taken place in this succession cause. It has been mentioned severally, in an effort to push the administratrix to have her grant confirmed. As there is no evidence that the estate herein has assets, it would appear that there is nothing to be distributed. There would be no point, therefore, of keeping this cause alive. I shall accede to the request by Mr. Were to formally have the file closed, and moved to the archives.
8. The final orders are that the grant made herein on 23rd May 2012, to Getruda Ilungat Ikolongi, is hereby revoked, for having become useless and inoperative, in terms of section 76(e) of the Law of Succession Act, cap 160, Laws of Kenya, for the estate herein has no assets to be administered. The Deputy Registrar shall cause the court file herein to be closed, and thereafter moved to the archives. There shall be liberty to reopen the file, should assets credited to the name of the deceased be traced. There shall be no order on costs. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT BUSIA ON THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023WM MUSYOKAJUDGE