[2025] KEHC 1049 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 1049 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's averments were uncontroverted, as the respondents neither filed a response nor appeared at the hearing despite being served. The further rectified certificate of confirmation of grant clearly set out the equal distribution of the late Joseph Kerich's share among his heirs,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 1049 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice Chepkemoi Kenyit; Respondent: Mary Cherono Korir; Respondent: Simon Kiplangat Korir; Respondent: Geoffrey Kipkemoi Korir; Respondent: Leonard Kibet Korir
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E048 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Enforcement of Certificate of Confirmation of Grant and Ancillary Orders
Outcome
Application allowed; orders granted as prayed with modifications.
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Land Subdivision, Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Administration of Estates Confirmation of Grant Land Subdivision Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Chepkemoi Kenyit

Applicant

Mary Cherono Korir

Respondent

Simon Kiplangat Korir

Respondent

Geoffrey Kipkemoi Korir

Respondent

Leonard Kibet Korir

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Enforcement of Certificate of Confirmation of Grant and Ancillary Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to enforcement of the rectified certificate of confirmation of grant for subdivision of the estate land.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents should be compelled to execute mutation and land registration forms or have the Deputy Registrar execute them in their stead.
  3. 3 Whether police protection should be provided to facilitate the subdivision process due to threats of violence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's averments were uncontroverted, as the respondents neither filed a response nor appeared at the hearing despite being served. The further rectified certificate of confirmation of grant clearly set out the equal distribution of the late Joseph Kerich's share among his heirs, including the applicant and the respondents. The applicant's attempts to implement the grant had been met with resistance and threats of violence from the respondents, justifying the need for police protection. The court held that the respondents are obligated to execute the necessary mutation and land registration forms to effectuate the subdivision and transfer of the estate...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; orders granted as prayed with modifications.

Orders

  • Respondents are directed to execute the mutation forms and any other land registration forms within 30 days; in default, the Deputy Registrar is authorized to execute the documents on their behalf.
  • The Officer Commanding Sosiot Police Station is directed to provide security to the District Surveyor during the subdivision of Parcel No. Kericho/Kapsuser/285 as per the rectified certificate of confirmation of grant dated 23rd May, 2024.