[2025] KEHC 2000 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for the extension of time to appeal, noting the emotional and familial significance of succession matters and the importance of allowing parties to exhaust all avenues of redress. The court was not persuaded that the collection of the grant by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2000 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Petronila Adhiambo Makokha; Applicant: Albert Okuku Makokha; Respondent: Philip Oundo Makokha
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 387 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal out of time allowed; stay of transmission of estate granted pending appeal.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Confirmation of Grant, Succession Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petronila Adhiambo Makokha
Applicant
Albert Okuku Makokha
Applicant
Philip Oundo Makokha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the ruling confirming the grant and devolution of the estate.
- 2 Whether the collection of the grant by a third party constituted notice to the applicants.
- 3 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending the intended appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for the extension of time to appeal, noting the emotional and familial significance of succession matters and the importance of allowing parties to exhaust all avenues of redress. The court was not persuaded that the collection of the grant by Francis Albert Makokha, who was not an applicant, constituted notice to the applicants. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time and ordered a stay of transmission of the estate pending the filing and hearing of the intended appeal, with the stay lapsing if the appeal is not filed within 45 days.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal out of time allowed; stay of transmission of estate granted pending appeal.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicants to lodge their appeal at the Court of Appeal within 45 days of the date of this ruling.
- Administrators are restrained from transmitting the estate in terms of the orders of 4th October 2024 pending the filing and hearing of the contemplated appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
In re Estate of Makokha Wamania (Deceased) (Succession Cause 387 of 2012) [2025] KEHC 2000 (KLR) (21 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2000 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Succession Cause 387 of 2012
WM Musyoka, J
February 21, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MAKOKHA WAMANIA (DECEASED)
Ruling
1. On 4th October 2024, I delivered a ruling herein, where I confirmed the grant herein, and made orders on devolution of the estate, among other orders.
2. Petronila Adhiambo Makokha and Albert Okuku Makokha are aggrieved by that ruling, and have filed a Motion, dated 16th December 2024, for leave to appeal out of time. They aver that they obtained a copy of the impugned ruling after the time for filing appeal had lapsed.
3. Philip Oundo Makokha has opposed that application. His affidavit was sworn on 13th January 2025. His principal argument is that the applicants were aware of the ruling as far back 12th November 2024, when the 2nd applicant collected a copy of the grant and certificate of confirmation, issued pursuant to the orders made in the said ruling.
4. Both sides argued the application orally, before me, on 15th January 2025.
5. The impugned ruling was delivered on 4th October 2024. The record reflects that a Francis Albert Makokha collected a copy of the grant issued on 17th October 2024, on 12th November 2024. Francis Albert Makokha is not one of the applicants, and I am not prepared to presume that he had anything to do with the applicants, nor that he had been sent by them.
6. Succession is about family property, most of which is usually ancestral land. There is emotional attachment to such property, and, so far as possible, parties should be given a chance to exhaust all avenues of redress, with respect to it, to get closure. Secondly, the applicants have a right to get a second opinion from an expanded bench.
7. Consequently, I shall extend the period within which the applicants should file appeal at the Court of Appeal, by granting them leave to lodge their appeal within the next 45 days of the date of this ruling.
8. To facilitate that process, let the administrators not transmit the estate herein in terms of the orders of 4th October 2024, pending the filing and hearing of the contemplated appeal. The stay order shall lapse, should the appeal not be filed within the 45 days that I have allowed.
9. The Deputy Registrar shall cause the proceedings herein to be typed, and made available to the parties, as soon as possible, subject to payment of the requisite fees and costs on typing and certification, if applicable.
10. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND SIGNED AT BUSIA, AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT, ON THIS 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025. W MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.Mr. Philip Oundo Makokha, administrator, in person.Ms. Petronilla Adhiambo Makokha, 1st protestor, in person.Mr. Albert Okuku Makokha, 2nd protestor, in person.