[2022] KEHC 12384 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12384 (KLR)

The court found that the amended certificate of confirmation of grant issued on March 13, 2019 omitted the names of two sons of the deceased, John Kirimi M’Ambutu and Peter Kaimenyi M’Ambutu, from the distribution of LR No Abothuguchi/Katheri/195 without any persuasive explanation. Additionally, the inclusion of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12384 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Mworia M’ambutu; Applicant: Dennis Gikunda Kirimi; Respondent: Joseph Mwenda M’ambutu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 248 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation/annulment of Amended Grant
Outcome
application allowed; amended grant revoked
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant Revocation, Estate Distribution, Omission of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession Grant Revocation Estate Distribution Omission of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Mworia M’ambutu

Applicant

Dennis Gikunda Kirimi

Applicant

Joseph Mwenda M’ambutu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation/annulment of Amended Grant

  1. 1 Whether the amended certificate of confirmation of grant omitted rightful beneficiaries without explanation.
  2. 2 Whether the inclusion of a purchaser (David Guantai) as a beneficiary was lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the amended grant should be revoked or annulled.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the amended certificate of confirmation of grant issued on March 13, 2019 omitted the names of two sons of the deceased, John Kirimi M’Ambutu and Peter Kaimenyi M’Ambutu, from the distribution of LR No Abothuguchi/Katheri/195 without any persuasive explanation. Additionally, the inclusion of David Guantai, a purchaser and not a beneficiary, in the distribution of LR No Abothuguchi/Katheri/1082 was not supported by evidence of a valid sale or consent from all relevant parties. These omissions and irregularities constituted sufficient grounds for revocation of the amended grant under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The court held that the respondent failed in...

Court Disposition

application allowed; amended grant revoked

Orders

  • The amended certificate of confirmation of grant issued on March 13, 2019 is revoked.
  • The respondent is directed to distribute the estate as previously ordered by the court, with liberty to seek further directions if necessary.