[2023] KEHC 24113 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 24113 (KLR)

The court found that the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on December 31, 2013 was fundamentally flawed as it failed to disclose all beneficiaries of the estate as required by law, did not distribute the estate, and omitted one of the two appointed administratrices without explanation, despite the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 24113 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Moseti; Respondent: Mark Moseti Mwamba (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 251 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Confirmation of Grant and Directions for Fresh Confirmation
Outcome
Certificate of confirmation of grant set aside; fresh summons for confirmation of grant to be filed; application dated September 1, 2023 to be considered with the fresh summons.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Rights, Trusteeship of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Beneficiary Rights Trusteeship of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Moseti

Applicant

Mark Moseti Mwamba (Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Confirmation of Grant and Directions for Fresh Confirmation

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on December 31, 2013 was valid given the non-disclosure of all beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the omission of the second administratrix in the confirmation of grant was justified.
  3. 3 Whether the estate was properly distributed in accordance with the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on December 31, 2013 was fundamentally flawed as it failed to disclose all beneficiaries of the estate as required by law, did not distribute the estate, and omitted one of the two appointed administratrices without explanation, despite the presence of a minor beneficiary. These omissions contravened the mandatory provisions of the Law of Succession Act regarding disclosure, representation, and distribution. Consequently, the court set aside the confirmation of grant, recalled the certificate, and directed the petitioners to file a fresh summons for confirmation of grant with a full schedule of assets, beneficiaries, and...

Court Disposition

Certificate of confirmation of grant set aside; fresh summons for confirmation of grant to be filed; application dated September 1, 2023 to be considered with the fresh summons.

Orders

  • The order made on December 31, 2013 confirming the grant is set aside.
  • The certificate of confirmation of grant issued is recalled.