[2020] KEHC 398 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 398 (KLR)

The court found that the suit property, KERICHO/SOSIOT/1811, remained registered in the name of the deceased and that neither the respondent nor the 1st petitioner had established a right to deal with it prior to confirmation of grant. Applying the principles from Giella v Cassman Brown, the court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 398 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rucy Chebore Kipkeino; Applicant: Kiprono Langat aka Francis Langat; Respondent: Raeli Chepngetich Langat; Respondent: Paul Kiptonui Langat
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bomet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 93 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Administration
Outcome
Application allowed in part, injunction granted, directions for appointment of new administrator, no order as to costs.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Injunctions, Intestate Succession, Appointment of Administrator
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Administration of Estates Injunctions Intestate Succession Appointment of Administrator

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rucy Chebore Kipkeino

Applicant

Kiprono Langat aka Francis Langat

Applicant

Raeli Chepngetich Langat

Respondent

Paul Kiptonui Langat

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Administration

  1. 1 Whether a temporary injunction should issue to restrain the respondent from dealing with the estate property pending confirmation of grant.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be included as a co-administratrix of the estate to prevent mismanagement.
  3. 3 Whether the estate property is subject to distribution among all beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit property, KERICHO/SOSIOT/1811, remained registered in the name of the deceased and that neither the respondent nor the 1st petitioner had established a right to deal with it prior to confirmation of grant. Applying the principles from Giella v Cassman Brown, the court held that the applicant had established a prima facie case for preservation of the estate, as there was a risk of irreparable harm to the beneficiaries' interests if the property was alienated or developed. The court further directed that a new administrator be appointed to replace the deceased co-administrator, ensuring proper representation of all beneficiaries. The application for injunction...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part, injunction granted, directions for appointment of new administrator, no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The respondent is restrained from constructing permanent structures or alienating, selling, transferring, or distributing land parcel KERICHO/SOSIOT/1811 pending confirmation of grant.
  • Beneficiaries to appoint another administrator to replace the late Elijah Cheruiyot Langat.