[2020] KEHC 9893 (KLR)
The court found that the application for rectification of the grant was not merited because the changes sought—removal of a deceased co-administrator and redistribution of unlisted assets—were substantive and not the type of errors contemplated under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act. The court held that such...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 9893 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Edith Namulanda Barasa; Respondent: Francis Oduor Ober
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1011 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- JO Nyarangi
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Grant Rectification, Appointment of Administrator, Trust for Minors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edith Namulanda Barasa
Applicant
Francis Oduor Ober
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of representation can be rectified to remove a deceased co-administrator and allow the applicant to act as sole administrator.
- 2 Whether the applicant can distribute unlisted assets without proper amendment and review of the grant.
- 3 Whether the existence of minor beneficiaries necessitates the appointment of more than one administrator.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for rectification of the grant was not merited because the changes sought—removal of a deceased co-administrator and redistribution of unlisted assets—were substantive and not the type of errors contemplated under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act. The court held that such changes require an application for amendment and review of the grant under Sections 58 and 81, which provide for the appointment of a new co-administrator in place of the deceased and for the inclusion and distribution of unlisted assets with the consent of all beneficiaries. The court emphasized the necessity of having more than one administrator where minor beneficiaries...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for rectification of grant is dismissed.
- The applicant is directed to make an application for amendment and review of the grant under Sections 58 and 81 of the Law of Succession Act for appointment of a co-administrator and inclusion of unlisted assets.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1011 OF 2007
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARTIN OTIENO OBER(DECEASED)
RULING
1. The deceased herein died intestate on 2nd February 2007 leaving behind; a widow by the name of Edith Namulanda, COO a son then aged 5 years, CO a son then aged 2 years old, AOW (mother) and Francis Oduor Ober (brother) as survivors.
2. On 2nd April 2007, Edith Namulanda Barasa and Francis Oduor Ober petitioned for a grant of representation. The same was granted jointly to the two on 3rd August 2007.
3. Among the properties listed as comprising the estate were, Nairobi/Block 82/2140 Tena Estate, KAQ 519T Nissan B14, Life Insurance claim from CBK Scheme, Banki Kuu Sacco Shares, Death Gratuity from CBK Pension Fund.
4. On 6th August 2008, the grant was confirmed and estate shared out as follows;
(i)Nissan Sunny B14 and 20% Life Insurance claim from CBK Scheme and CBK Pension Fund to Edith Namulanda Barasa.
(ii) 10% Life Insurance claim from CBK Scheme and CBK Pension Fund to Apelles Ober Wambundo.
(iii) 70% Life Insurance claim from CBK Scheme and CBK pension fund at Nairobi/Block 82/2-40 – Tena Estate to Edith Namulanda Barasa and Francis Oduor Ober in trust for Cyril Oduor Ober (minor).
(iv) 70% Life Insurance claim from CBK Scheme and CBK Pension Fund and Nairobi/Block 82/2. 40 - Tena Estate to Edith Namulanda Barasa and Francis Oduor Ober in trust for Chris Ochieng (minor).
5. Vide Summons for Rectification of Grant dated 14th May, 2020 filed pursuant to section 47 and 76 Law of Succession Act, Rules 43 and 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules, Edith Namulanda Barasa the 1st administrator sought rectification of the grant on grounds that Francis Oduor Ober one of the administrators has since died and therefore hindering completion of the administration of the estate. A copy of the death certificate was attached as proof of his death (see Annexture E2).
6. The applicant sought distribution of an asset known as Investments in Kingdom Securities Account Nos. xxxx, xxxx and xxxx which are to be held by the applicant in trust for Ober (minor) and CO (minor).
7. The application is grounded on the facts set out on the face of it and an affidavit sworn on 14th May 2020 by the applicant. Basically, the application is seeking the removal of the deceased co-administrator from the grant so that the applicant can administer the grant alone. She also wants to distribute investments in Kingdom Securities accounts.
8. According to Mr. Wachakana counsel for the applicant, the applicant will assume the duties of an administrator alone and then distribute and hold property acquired for the benefit of the estate after confirmation of the grant.
9. I have considered the application herein, affidavit in support and oral submissions by counsel for the applicant. The application herein is brought under Sections 47 and 74 of the Law of Succession. Section 47 deals with court’s jurisdiction which is not in dispute. Regarding Section 74 of the Law of Succession, it deals with rectification of errors. in a grant. This provision only addresses errors in names, and descriptions, or in setting forth the time and place of the deceased’s death, or the purpose in limited grant. Such errors can be altered or amended.
10. In this case there is no error envisaged under Section 74 of the Act or Rule 43 of the Probate and Administration rules quoted by the applicant. Basically, the grant requires amendment and review so as to redistribute undistributed property and replace the deceased administrator with another one owing to the existence of a resulting trust arising out of the minors as beneficiaries.
11. Since one administrator is deceased and there are beneficiaries who are still minors, the need to have more than one administrator is still relevant pursuant to Sections 58, 66 and 81 of the Law of Succession.
12. For the above reasons stated, it is my finding that the application is not merited and the prayers sought cannot issue. The applicant to make an application on amendment and review of the grant pursuant to Section 58 and 81 of the Law of Succession for appointment of a co-administrator in place of the deceased administrator and thereafter seek to include unlisted assets in the list of assets and then propose on how to distribute the same with the consent of other beneficiaries. Order accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020.
...........................
J. N. ONYIEGO
JUDGE