[2018] KEHC 258 (KLR)
The court found that, although the respondent failed to file a response, the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support the allegations of fraudulent grant or sale of estate property. The purported will was not translated into English and could not be considered. No documentary proof of sale...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 258 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Kimani Kinyanjui; Respondent: Symon Kinyanjui Gachigwah
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyahururu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 76 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Suspension of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Injunction Against Estate Interference, Preservation of Estate, Challenge to Grant of Administration, Alleged Fraud in Succession, Unconfirmed Grant, Sale of Estate Property
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Kimani Kinyanjui
Applicant
Symon Kinyanjui Gachigwah
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Suspension of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with the estate property pending confirmation of grant.
- 2 Whether the letters of administration intestate issued to the respondent should be suspended or stayed.
- 3 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support allegations of fraudulent grant and sale of estate property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the respondent failed to file a response, the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support the allegations of fraudulent grant or sale of estate property. The purported will was not translated into English and could not be considered. No documentary proof of sale transactions was provided. However, given the risk of further alienation of the estate before confirmation of grant, the court exercised its discretion to grant an order preserving the estate as sought in prayer 3 of the application. The court declined to suspend the letters of administration, as the applicant failed to demonstrate a compelling need for such an order. The application was...
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- Order of preservation of the estate granted as per prayer 3 of the application.
- Prayer for suspension of the letters of administration declined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAHURURU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.76 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARY NJERI KIMANI alias MUCEKE KINYANJUI – DECEASED
AND
JAMES KIMANI KINYANJUI.....................APPLICANT
-V E R S U S –
SYMON KINYANJUI GACHIGWAH......RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
Before me is the summons dated 1/4/2015, brought by James Kimani Kinyanjui (applicant) who seeks for an order of injunction restraining the respondent Symon Kinyanjui Gachigwah (Respondent) by himself, his agents or servants from subdividing, selling, demanding, dividing or in any way interfering with the parcel of land Nyandarua/Mawingo/227.
It is also prayed that the letters of administration intestate made to the respondent on 8/12/2014 be suspended or stayed pending hearing of this application. The applicant contends that the grant was obtained fraudulently by making a false statement and by concealment from the court of material fact; that the respondent failed to diligently administer the deceased’s estate. In the supporting affidavit, the applicant deponed that he is the son of Mary Njeri Kimani alias Muceke Kinyanjui who died on 12/9/2002; that the deceased had three children, namely Symon Kinyanjui (the respondent), James Kimani and Agnes Wanjiku Kinyanjui; that Symon filed this petition for letters of administration which were issued to him on 8/12/2014 (JKK1), that the respondent concealed material facts to the effect that the deceased left a will (JKK2); that since the respondent obtained the grant, he has sold 8 acres of land to four persons and two people have built permanent structures thereon; that the applicant sold an acre of his share JK3; that to date the letters have not been confirmed and the applicant fears the estate will be wasted as the respondent is selling more land; that the respondent has already sold all his share and an acre from the applicant’s and Agnes’ entitlement and that it is necessary for the court to preserve the estate.
When the application came up for hearing, the respondent’s counsel had sent Mr. Waichungo to hold his brief and ask for an adjournment because Mr. Mwangi Advocate, counsel for the respondent had not filed his replying affidavit.
The application was opposed and the court upheld the objection because this application was filed way back in 2015. The respondent has had over three years to file a replying affidavit which he has not done. The court found the application for adjournment to lack in merit and proceeded to hear the applicant.
The applicant has annexed a document to the application which he purports to be a Will left by the deceased. Unfortunately, the said document is written in vernacular (Kikuyu) and the counsel never bothered to file a translation. The court cannot tell what the document is all about. To the court, it is a piece of paper.
The applicant also alleges that the land has been sold by the respondent. However, he did not attach any document as evidence of the sale transactions.
Even though the respondent did not file any response, the applicant has to support his averments with evidence and not mere statements. For that reason, I will only grant an order of preservation of the estate in terms of prayer 3 of the application.
I will however decline to suspend the letters of administration as prayed in prayer 4 because the applicant has not demonstrated the need.
The application succeeds in part.
Prayer 3 granted.
Prayer 4 declined.
Costs to be in the cause.
Dated and Signed at NYAHURURU this 8thday of October, 2018.
.........................
R.P.V. Wendoh
JUDGE
PRESENT:
Mr. Kihiri holding brief for Mr. Chege – Advocate for the Applicant/Respondent
Soi - Court Assistant