[2024] KEHC 6115 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6115 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent of the parties as an order, finding that all parties, through their respective counsel, agreed to withdraw the earlier summons and to allow the new summons with specific amendments to the mode of distribution. The amendments included substituting the name of the estate representative...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6115 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Estate of Margaret Esther Dames; Applicant: All 7 beneficiaries in the Estate of Mary Rose Wairimu Dames
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 85 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Consent Order on Summons for Amendment of Distribution
Outcome
Consent adopted as order of the court; summons dated 18th October, 2023 withdrawn; summons dated 18th April, 2024 allowed in part; amendments to mode of distribution granted; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Succession, Estate Distribution, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Estate Distribution Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Estate of Margaret Esther Dames

Respondent

All 7 beneficiaries in the Estate of Mary Rose Wairimu Dames

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Consent Order on Summons for Amendment of Distribution

  1. 1 Whether the summons dated 18th October, 2023 should be withdrawn without costs.
  2. 2 Whether the summons dated 18th April, 2024 should be allowed in terms of prayers 2 and 3.
  3. 3 Whether the consent to the mode of distribution should be amended to reflect the correct names of beneficiaries and advocates.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent of the parties as an order, finding that all parties, through their respective counsel, agreed to withdraw the earlier summons and to allow the new summons with specific amendments to the mode of distribution. The amendments included substituting the name of the estate representative and correcting the advocate's name in the distribution schedule. The court found no reason to deny the consent, as it was lawful, did not prejudice any party, and was in the interests of justice and efficient administration of the estate. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs, reflecting the consensual nature of the resolution.

Court Disposition

Consent adopted as order of the court; summons dated 18th October, 2023 withdrawn; summons dated 18th April, 2024 allowed in part; amendments to mode of distribution granted; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Summons dated 18th October, 2023 is withdrawn with no orders as to costs.
  • Summons dated 18th April, 2024 is allowed in terms of prayers 2 and 3.