[2022] KEHC 11051 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11051 (KLR)

The court found that the administrators had properly identified all beneficiaries and dependants of the deceased, including those who are now deceased, and had proposed a fair mode of distribution of the estate. The court emphasized that equity is not equality and that litigation must come to an end. The proposed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11051 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Maina; Applicant: Alice Wangui Maina; Respondent: Mary Njoki; Objector: Hannah Nyambura Ngare; Petitioner: Mwangi Mbaria; Petitioner: James Getua Mbaria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 258 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Summons for confirmation of grant allowed; grant confirmed; estate distributed as ordered; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Identification of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Intestate Succession Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Identification of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Maina

Applicant

Alice Wangui Maina

Applicant

Mary Njoki

Respondent

Hannah Nyambura Ngare

Objector

Mwangi Mbaria

Petitioner

James Getua Mbaria

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the administrators have properly ascertained all persons beneficially entitled to a share in the estate.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate is fair and in accordance with the law.
  3. 3 Whether the requirements of section 71(2) of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 40(4) of the Probate and Administration Rules have been satisfied.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the administrators had properly identified all beneficiaries and dependants of the deceased, including those who are now deceased, and had proposed a fair mode of distribution of the estate. The court emphasized that equity is not equality and that litigation must come to an end. The proposed distribution was deemed to comply with the requirements of section 71(2) of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 40(4) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Consequently, the court confirmed the grant and ordered the estate to be distributed as proposed, finding the mode of distribution to be fair and in accordance with the law.

Court Disposition

Summons for confirmation of grant allowed; grant confirmed; estate distributed as ordered; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The Summons for Confirmation of Grant dated 26th November, 2021 is allowed.
  • The grant made on 23rd June 2014 is confirmed.