[2019] KEHC 9620 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 9620 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the grant was obtained through concealment of material facts or false statements. The evidence showed that the applicant and his witnesses were aware of the succession proceedings and did not establish that the deceased held the land in trust for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 9620 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Julia Kairigo M’Arimi; Respondent: Lucy Mwari Kirugi; Appellant: Charles Kirimi Kirugi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 174 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Revocation of Grant, Trusts in Land, Jurisdiction of Courts
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Revocation of Grant Trusts in Land Jurisdiction of Courts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julia Kairigo M’Arimi

Applicant

Lucy Mwari Kirugi

Respondent

Charles Kirimi Kirugi

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the court that the grant made should be revoked.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to declare that the deceased held land in trust for the applicant's father.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the grant was obtained through concealment of material facts or false statements. The evidence showed that the applicant and his witnesses were aware of the succession proceedings and did not establish that the deceased held the land in trust for the applicant’s father. Furthermore, the court held that it lacked jurisdiction to determine trust claims over land, as such matters are reserved for the Environment and Land Court. Consequently, the application for revocation of the grant was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 25th July 2017 for revocation of grant is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.